Transparency on Digital Platforms

Q4 Social Sciences
Rolf H. Weber
{"title":"Transparency on Digital Platforms","authors":"Rolf H. Weber","doi":"10.38023/40e03d49-1349-41d1-8c35-e35f592028f3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of transparency on digital platforms due to insufficient comprehensibility, mandated disclosure rules, information overload, opacity and fragmentation jeopardizes the rights’ situation of users. Therefore, transparency alone is not a convincing «disinfectant» for digital platforms; other normative models need increased attention. Consequently, the article analyses alternative regulatory approaches such as accountability, auditability, observability, content moderation and – with regard to the implementation of rules – pleads for a concept of targeted transparency based on elaborated soft law instruments.","PeriodicalId":37510,"journal":{"name":"Jusletter IT","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jusletter IT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38023/40e03d49-1349-41d1-8c35-e35f592028f3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of transparency on digital platforms due to insufficient comprehensibility, mandated disclosure rules, information overload, opacity and fragmentation jeopardizes the rights’ situation of users. Therefore, transparency alone is not a convincing «disinfectant» for digital platforms; other normative models need increased attention. Consequently, the article analyses alternative regulatory approaches such as accountability, auditability, observability, content moderation and – with regard to the implementation of rules – pleads for a concept of targeted transparency based on elaborated soft law instruments.
数码平台的透明度
数字平台由于可理解性不足、强制性披露规则、信息过载、不透明和碎片化而缺乏透明度,危及用户的权利状况。因此,透明度本身并不是数字平台令人信服的“消毒剂”;其他规范模型需要更多的关注。因此,本文分析了其他监管方法,如问责制、可审计性、可观察性、内容节制,并就规则的实施提出了一种基于详细阐述的软法律文书的有针对性的透明度概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jusletter IT
Jusletter IT Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Jusletter IT erscheint vier Mal im Jahr ausschliesslich online. Im Fokus der Zeitschrift stehen die Themenbereiche IT und Recht, insbesondere Datenschutz und Datensicherheit, Big Data, e-Justice sowie LegalTech. Spezialisierte Praktiker und Wissenschaftler aus verschiedenen Ländern verfassen qualitativ hochstehende, themenspezifische und rechtsgebietsübergreifende Beiträge in deutscher und/oder englischer Sprache. Die Beiträge von Jusletter IT sind zitierfähig und noch nach Jahren unter derselben Internetadresse auffindbar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信