Meaning definitions through lexical (macro) functions: Old English quantity, size and rank

IF 0.3 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Raquel Vea Escarza
{"title":"Meaning definitions through lexical (macro) functions: Old English quantity, size and rank","authors":"Raquel Vea Escarza","doi":"10.14198/raei.2023.39.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to complete and systematize affixal meaning definitions by examining the Old English derived nominal and adjectival lexicon from a structural-functional framework. The main dictionaries of reference in this language have proven to contribute limited affixal information; besides, one and the same dictionary organizes its affixal entries quite dissimilarly both formally and content-wise. Given this background, the present work offers an insight into the derived lexicon and suggests more accurate definitions based on an approach that explains form and meaning associations in terms of lexical functions and macrofunctions. The data of analysis have been retrieved from the lexical database of Old English Nerthus, which has supplied the inventory of affixes and of affixed nouns and adjectives performing a lexical function belonging to the semantic categories quantity, size or rank, which apply whenever an entity or a property experience an increase or a decrease in quantity, quality or status respectively. Each affix is defined conforming to the different meanings it conveys, the source and target categories involved in the derivation process and the predicates that fit the rule in each case. An approach based on form and meaning associations in the definition of affixal meaning has demonstrated to have major implications not only in the field of lexicology but also of lexicography inasmuch as it permits to revise, complete and enhance dictionary entries and gain systematicity in the manner the information is rendered.","PeriodicalId":33428,"journal":{"name":"Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2023.39.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to complete and systematize affixal meaning definitions by examining the Old English derived nominal and adjectival lexicon from a structural-functional framework. The main dictionaries of reference in this language have proven to contribute limited affixal information; besides, one and the same dictionary organizes its affixal entries quite dissimilarly both formally and content-wise. Given this background, the present work offers an insight into the derived lexicon and suggests more accurate definitions based on an approach that explains form and meaning associations in terms of lexical functions and macrofunctions. The data of analysis have been retrieved from the lexical database of Old English Nerthus, which has supplied the inventory of affixes and of affixed nouns and adjectives performing a lexical function belonging to the semantic categories quantity, size or rank, which apply whenever an entity or a property experience an increase or a decrease in quantity, quality or status respectively. Each affix is defined conforming to the different meanings it conveys, the source and target categories involved in the derivation process and the predicates that fit the rule in each case. An approach based on form and meaning associations in the definition of affixal meaning has demonstrated to have major implications not only in the field of lexicology but also of lexicography inasmuch as it permits to revise, complete and enhance dictionary entries and gain systematicity in the manner the information is rendered.
通过词汇(宏)函数定义意义:古英语quantity, size和rank
本文从结构-功能的角度出发,通过对古英语派生词名和形容词词汇的考察,对词缀意义的定义进行了完善和系统的梳理。这种语言的主要参考词典已被证明能提供有限的词缀信息;此外,同一本词典对词缀条目的组织形式和内容都完全不同。在此背景下,本研究提供了对衍生词汇的深入了解,并基于从词汇功能和宏函数方面解释形式和意义关联的方法提出了更准确的定义。分析数据来自古英语Nerthus的词汇数据库,该数据库提供了词缀和附加名词和形容词的清单,这些词缀和附加名词和形容词具有属于语义类别quantity、size或rank的词汇功能,它们分别适用于一个实体或一个属性在数量、质量或地位上的增加或减少。每个词缀的定义都符合它所传达的不同含义、派生过程中涉及的源和目标类别以及在每种情况下符合规则的谓词。在词缀意义的定义中,基于形式和意义关联的方法不仅在词汇学领域,而且在词典编纂领域都具有重要意义,因为它允许修改、完善和增强词典条目,并在信息呈现方式上获得系统性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses
Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信