DUAL PERSPECTIVE DIAGNOSIS ON LOW CARBON CITY PERFORMANCE

IF 0.7 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Liyin Shen, Haijun Bao, Yi Yang, Zhenchuan Yang, Xiangrui Xu, Lingyu Zhang, Shiju Liao, Ziwei Chen
{"title":"DUAL PERSPECTIVE DIAGNOSIS ON LOW CARBON CITY PERFORMANCE","authors":"Liyin Shen, Haijun Bao, Yi Yang, Zhenchuan Yang, Xiangrui Xu, Lingyu Zhang, Shiju Liao, Ziwei Chen","doi":"10.3992/jgb.18.3.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Developing low-carbon cities (LCC) is a strategic measure to mitigate climate change. This study proposes to diagnose LCC performance from a dual perspective in order to identify problematic areas for improvement. The dual perspective refers to management processes (including Plan, Do, Check, and Act) and low carbon city performance dimensions (namely, energy structure, economic development, production efficiency, urban population, water carbon sink, forest carbon sink, green space carbon sink, and low carbon technology). A diagnosis model has been introduced based on the dimension-process dual perspective. The model has been applied for diagnosing the LCC performance in four municipalities in China. It has been found that the performance in the economic development dimension is much better than in other LCC dimensions, and the performance in Plan and Do stages are better than that in other stages. This reflects the traditional practice in China where more attention and resources are often given to urban planning and implementation with less attention to checks and feedback. The findings from this study provide important references for both further research in the discipline and practical application in promoting LCC in other cities.","PeriodicalId":51753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Green Building","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Green Building","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.18.3.167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Developing low-carbon cities (LCC) is a strategic measure to mitigate climate change. This study proposes to diagnose LCC performance from a dual perspective in order to identify problematic areas for improvement. The dual perspective refers to management processes (including Plan, Do, Check, and Act) and low carbon city performance dimensions (namely, energy structure, economic development, production efficiency, urban population, water carbon sink, forest carbon sink, green space carbon sink, and low carbon technology). A diagnosis model has been introduced based on the dimension-process dual perspective. The model has been applied for diagnosing the LCC performance in four municipalities in China. It has been found that the performance in the economic development dimension is much better than in other LCC dimensions, and the performance in Plan and Do stages are better than that in other stages. This reflects the traditional practice in China where more attention and resources are often given to urban planning and implementation with less attention to checks and feedback. The findings from this study provide important references for both further research in the discipline and practical application in promoting LCC in other cities.
低碳城市绩效的双重视角诊断
发展低碳城市是减缓气候变化的战略举措。本研究建议从双重视角来诊断LCC绩效,以找出需要改进的问题领域。双视角是指管理过程(包括Plan、Do、Check和Act)和低碳城市绩效维度(即能源结构、经济发展、生产效率、城市人口、水碳汇、森林碳汇、绿地碳汇和低碳技术)。提出了一种基于维度-过程双视角的诊断模型。应用该模型对中国4个直辖市的城市成本控制绩效进行了诊断。研究发现,经济发展维度的绩效远好于其他LCC维度,计划和执行阶段的绩效优于其他阶段。这反映了中国的传统做法,更多的关注和资源往往放在城市规划和实施上,而对检查和反馈的关注较少。本研究结果为进一步开展学科研究和在其他城市推广低成本城市的实际应用提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Green Building is to present the very best peer-reviewed research in green building design, construction, engineering, technological innovation, facilities management, building information modeling, and community and urban planning. The Research section of the Journal of Green Building publishes peer-reviewed articles in the fields of engineering, architecture, construction, construction management, building science, facilities management, landscape architecture, interior design, urban and community planning, and all disciplines related to the built environment. In addition, the Journal of Green Building offers the following sections: Industry Corner that offers applied articles of successfully completed sustainable buildings and landscapes; New Directions in Teaching and Research that offers guidance from teachers and researchers on incorporating innovative sustainable learning into the curriculum or the likely directions of future research; and Campus Sustainability that offers articles from programs dedicated to greening the university campus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信