The Influence of Social Networks on the System of Public Administration, Law and Order, and the Judicial System

IF 0.3
Oleksandra Vasylchyshyn, Lina Storozhenko, Tetiana Babkova, Vitalii Kuchmenko, Volodymyr Kovalchuk
{"title":"The Influence of Social Networks on the System of Public Administration, Law and Order, and the Judicial System","authors":"Oleksandra Vasylchyshyn, Lina Storozhenko, Tetiana Babkova, Vitalii Kuchmenko, Volodymyr Kovalchuk","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.2027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This article examines the theoretical foundations and practical implications of social networks in the institutional landscape of public administration, law enforcement, and judicial power. It employs the paradigm of netocracy institutionalism to assess the multifaceted influence of social networks and the need for new concepts to understand the complexities of today's communication society.
 
 Methods: The research employs a systematic approach, drawing from theories like netocracy, e-government, legal field theory, and concepts related to internet communications and the information society. It utilizes structural-functional, institutional, and interdisciplinary approaches to analyze the role of social networks in public policy and modern political communication.
 
 Results: Social networks play a pivotal role in modern public administration, with an increasing reliance on information and communication technologies. The notion of e-government encompasses activities based on these technologies, including providing services, information exchange, public procurement, and more. A broader view of e-government focuses on transforming internal and external interactions for optimizing management and enhancing public services, thus promoting electronic democracy. The concept of netocratic public management emphasizes transparency, cooperation, and public involvement in decision-making, aligning with the principles of the information society. Netocracy, represented by a technologically adept elite, influences and manipulates public consciousness and behavior through advanced communication abilities in the digital realm.
 Conclusions: The study underscores the growing significance of social networks in modern governance, with netocracy emerging as a powerful and influential force in the digital age. It also highlights the need for new social structures and concepts to grasp the complexities of today's communication society. In this context, social networks have become indispensable tools for communication between governments and citizens, offering extensive opportunities for interaction and engagement.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":" 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.2027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article examines the theoretical foundations and practical implications of social networks in the institutional landscape of public administration, law enforcement, and judicial power. It employs the paradigm of netocracy institutionalism to assess the multifaceted influence of social networks and the need for new concepts to understand the complexities of today's communication society. Methods: The research employs a systematic approach, drawing from theories like netocracy, e-government, legal field theory, and concepts related to internet communications and the information society. It utilizes structural-functional, institutional, and interdisciplinary approaches to analyze the role of social networks in public policy and modern political communication. Results: Social networks play a pivotal role in modern public administration, with an increasing reliance on information and communication technologies. The notion of e-government encompasses activities based on these technologies, including providing services, information exchange, public procurement, and more. A broader view of e-government focuses on transforming internal and external interactions for optimizing management and enhancing public services, thus promoting electronic democracy. The concept of netocratic public management emphasizes transparency, cooperation, and public involvement in decision-making, aligning with the principles of the information society. Netocracy, represented by a technologically adept elite, influences and manipulates public consciousness and behavior through advanced communication abilities in the digital realm. Conclusions: The study underscores the growing significance of social networks in modern governance, with netocracy emerging as a powerful and influential force in the digital age. It also highlights the need for new social structures and concepts to grasp the complexities of today's communication society. In this context, social networks have become indispensable tools for communication between governments and citizens, offering extensive opportunities for interaction and engagement.
社会网络对公共行政体系、法律秩序和司法体系的影响
目的:本文探讨社会网络在公共行政、执法和司法权制度景观中的理论基础和实践意义。它采用网络政治制度主义的范式来评估社会网络的多方面影响,以及需要新概念来理解当今传播社会的复杂性。 & # x0D;方法:采用系统的研究方法,借鉴了网络政治、电子政务、法律领域理论以及网络传播和信息社会的相关概念。它利用结构-功能、制度和跨学科的方法来分析社会网络在公共政策和现代政治传播中的作用。 & # x0D;结果:社会网络在现代公共管理中发挥着关键作用,对信息和通信技术的依赖日益增加。电子政务的概念包含了基于这些技术的活动,包括提供服务、信息交换、公共采购等等。更广泛的电子政务观点侧重于改变内部和外部的互动,以优化管理和提高公共服务,从而促进电子民主。网络公共管理的概念强调决策的透明、合作和公众参与,符合信息社会的原则。以精通技术的精英为代表的网络政治,通过数字领域先进的沟通能力,影响和操纵公众意识和行为。结论:该研究强调了社交网络在现代治理中的日益重要的意义,网络政治正在成为数字时代一股强大而有影响力的力量。它还强调需要新的社会结构和概念来把握当今通信社会的复杂性。在这种情况下,社交网络已经成为政府和公民之间不可缺少的沟通工具,为互动和参与提供了广泛的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信