Is every teacher a teacher of oracy?

IF 0.4 3区文学 0 LITERATURE

ENGLISH Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1093/english/efad030

Amanda Moorghen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this article I argue that oracy is disciplinary: it has both generic and subject-specific dimensions that need to be taught explicitly. As such, every educator has a responsibility for teaching students the oracy skills they need in their subject domain; and providing them with the opportunity to practise using them. It cannot be hidden within a single department (e.g. treated as part of ‘English’ only), or treated as an add-on (e.g. ‘academic skills’, taught a-contextually and without relation to subject-experts).

查看原文本刊更多论文

难道每个老师都是演说的老师吗?

在这篇文章中，我认为演讲是学科的:它有通用的和特定学科的两个维度，需要明确地教授。因此，每个教育工作者都有责任教授学生在其学科领域所需的演讲技巧;并为他们提供练习使用它们的机会。它不能隐藏在一个单独的部门(例如，作为“英语”的一部分)，也不能作为一个附加部分(例如，“学术技能”，在背景下教授，与学科专家无关)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

ENGLISH LITERATURE-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： English is an internationally known journal of literary criticism, published on behalf of The English Association. Each issue contains essays on major works of English literature or on topics of general literary interest, aimed at readers within universities and colleges and presented in a lively and engaging style. There is a substantial review section, in which reviewers have space to situate a book within the context of recent developments in its field, and present a detailed argument. English is unusual among academic journals in publishing original poetry. This policy embodies the view that the critical and creative functions, often so widely separated in the teaching of English, can co-exist and cross-fertilise each other.