The toll of supervising from an anti-racist framework: reflections from a qualitative study

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sarah Ross Bussey
{"title":"The toll of supervising from an anti-racist framework: reflections from a qualitative study","authors":"Sarah Ross Bussey","doi":"10.1080/07325223.2023.2270970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPersistent race-based disparities in all domains of the US indicate the insidious nature of anti-Black racism. The helping professions have an opportunity to assist individuals and communities in working toward racial reconciliation and healing. Anti-racist and anti-oppressive practice standards represent one means to do so. Supervisors play a critical role in guiding anti-racist clinical practice and modeling these tenets. Little empirical scholarship exists around the strategies for supervising from this framework. Understanding these experiences help inform how to support anti-racist supervisors interpersonally and organizationally. Findings from a grounded theory qualitative study with social work supervisors shed light on these experiences.KEYWORDS: Anti-racismbiasesclinical supervisiongrounded theoryanti-black racism AcknowledgmentsI am deeply indebted to my dissertation chair, Dr. Vicki Lens, for her encouragement and support of my research process. Great appreciation, also, to my committee chair members, Dr. Alexis Jemal, Dr. Ben Anderson-Nathe, and Dr. Bryan Warde for their insights and contributions. Last, thank you to the participants in this study who shared their vulnerabilities and wisdom toward the goal of strengthening the profession.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Pseudonyms are used throughout.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSarah Ross BusseySarah Ross Bussey, LCSW, works as Director of Care Management with Mount Sinai Health Partners in NYC and is a post-doctoral fellow with the Briar Patch Collaboratory. Her research interests include anti-racism clinical and community-based interventions, social work practice and anti-racism supervision, effective interventions to enhance and tools to measure critical consciousness, restorative justice and community healing, health disparities, and, critical qualitative methods. She received her B.A. in Sociology from Reed College, Master’s in Social Work at Portland State University (where she was awarded the 2008 NASW Community Based Practice Award), and PhD in Social Welfare at the CUNY Graduate Center. Sarah worked in various capacities of youth work—with a focus on complex trauma, gang-involvement, transgenerational poverty, justice-system entrenchment, housing insecurity, and skill development—before joining an innovative program addressing clinical case management needs in a health care setting.","PeriodicalId":45847,"journal":{"name":"CLINICAL SUPERVISOR","volume":" 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLINICAL SUPERVISOR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2023.2270970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTPersistent race-based disparities in all domains of the US indicate the insidious nature of anti-Black racism. The helping professions have an opportunity to assist individuals and communities in working toward racial reconciliation and healing. Anti-racist and anti-oppressive practice standards represent one means to do so. Supervisors play a critical role in guiding anti-racist clinical practice and modeling these tenets. Little empirical scholarship exists around the strategies for supervising from this framework. Understanding these experiences help inform how to support anti-racist supervisors interpersonally and organizationally. Findings from a grounded theory qualitative study with social work supervisors shed light on these experiences.KEYWORDS: Anti-racismbiasesclinical supervisiongrounded theoryanti-black racism AcknowledgmentsI am deeply indebted to my dissertation chair, Dr. Vicki Lens, for her encouragement and support of my research process. Great appreciation, also, to my committee chair members, Dr. Alexis Jemal, Dr. Ben Anderson-Nathe, and Dr. Bryan Warde for their insights and contributions. Last, thank you to the participants in this study who shared their vulnerabilities and wisdom toward the goal of strengthening the profession.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Pseudonyms are used throughout.Additional informationNotes on contributorsSarah Ross BusseySarah Ross Bussey, LCSW, works as Director of Care Management with Mount Sinai Health Partners in NYC and is a post-doctoral fellow with the Briar Patch Collaboratory. Her research interests include anti-racism clinical and community-based interventions, social work practice and anti-racism supervision, effective interventions to enhance and tools to measure critical consciousness, restorative justice and community healing, health disparities, and, critical qualitative methods. She received her B.A. in Sociology from Reed College, Master’s in Social Work at Portland State University (where she was awarded the 2008 NASW Community Based Practice Award), and PhD in Social Welfare at the CUNY Graduate Center. Sarah worked in various capacities of youth work—with a focus on complex trauma, gang-involvement, transgenerational poverty, justice-system entrenchment, housing insecurity, and skill development—before joining an innovative program addressing clinical case management needs in a health care setting.
反种族主义框架下监督的代价:来自定性研究的反思
摘要美国各领域持续存在的种族差异表明了反黑人种族主义的阴险本质。帮助职业有机会帮助个人和社区努力实现种族和解和愈合。反种族主义和反压迫做法标准是实现这一目标的一种手段。主管在指导反种族主义临床实践和塑造这些原则方面发挥着关键作用。围绕这一框架下的监管策略的实证研究很少。了解这些经历有助于了解如何在人际关系和组织上支持反种族主义主管。对社会工作主管进行的一项扎根理论定性研究的结果揭示了这些经验。关键词:反种族歧视临床监督扎根理论反黑人种族歧视致谢我非常感谢我的论文主席Vicki Lens博士对我的研究过程的鼓励和支持。我也非常感谢我的委员会主席成员Alexis Jemal博士、Ben Anderson-Nathe博士和Bryan Warde博士的见解和贡献。最后,感谢本研究的参与者,他们分享了自己的弱点和智慧,以实现加强专业的目标。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本书自始至终使用笔名。撰稿人备注sarah Ross Bussey, LCSW,是纽约西奈山医疗合作伙伴的护理管理主任,也是Briar Patch合作实验室的博士后研究员。她的研究兴趣包括反种族主义临床和社区干预,社会工作实践和反种族主义监督,有效的干预措施,以增强和工具来衡量批判意识,恢复性司法和社区愈合,健康差距,和,关键的定性方法。她在里德学院获得社会学学士学位,在波特兰州立大学获得社会工作硕士学位(在那里她被授予2008年NASW社区实践奖),并在纽约市立大学研究生中心获得社会福利博士学位。在加入一个解决医疗保健环境中临床病例管理需求的创新项目之前,Sarah从事过各种各样的青年工作,重点是复杂的创伤、帮派参与、跨代贫困、司法系统巩固、住房不安全以及技能发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CLINICAL SUPERVISOR
CLINICAL SUPERVISOR HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Clinical Supervisor is the premier journal in the United States devoted exclusively to the art and science of clinical supervision. An interdisciplinary, refereed publication of the highest standards, the journal communicates the ideas, experiences, skills, techniques, concerns, and needs of supervisors in psychotherapy and mental health. You will find what you need to know about supervision to effectively supervise students and trainees. The Clinical Supervisor provides a unique forum for debate, historical analysis, new techniques, program description, theory, managed care and clinical practice issues, and other topics of vital interest to today"s supervisors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信