Introduction to special issue: Feminist manifestos and global constitutionalism

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Ruth Houghton, Aoife O’Donoghue
{"title":"Introduction to special issue: Feminist manifestos and global constitutionalism","authors":"Ruth Houghton, Aoife O’Donoghue","doi":"10.1017/s2045381723000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Feminists and women activists use manifestos to express their frustrations with legal and political systems, expose the harms suffered in their lived experiences under patriarchy, colonialism and capitalism, and call for radical political, legal and social change. This special issue on feminist manifestos and global constitutionalism considers the role of feminist manifestos in global constitutionalism. It interrogates the role of feminist manifestos in bringing about legal and political reform, their role as historical texts and sources of global constitutionalization, and their limitations as tools that are potentially both exclusionary and de-political. In their article, Ruth Houghton and Aoife O’Donoghue outline a role for feminist manifestos within feminist approaches to constituent power. Sheri Labenski uncovers from the archives the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom manifesto from 1924 and the outline for a ‘New International Order’. Gina Heathcote and Lucia Kula centre Lusophone African feminist action in Luanda, Angola, to problematize an approach to feminist manifestos that reiterates dominant feminisms, and instead argue for active silence by those more dominant feminist voices. In her conclusion to the special issue, Emily Jones uses posthuman feminism to interrogate and critique the claim of universality in global constitutionalism. Across this special issue, key themes emerge: the potential of inclusion and exclusion, and the role of manifesto as a method in knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":37136,"journal":{"name":"Global Constitutionalism","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Constitutionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045381723000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Feminists and women activists use manifestos to express their frustrations with legal and political systems, expose the harms suffered in their lived experiences under patriarchy, colonialism and capitalism, and call for radical political, legal and social change. This special issue on feminist manifestos and global constitutionalism considers the role of feminist manifestos in global constitutionalism. It interrogates the role of feminist manifestos in bringing about legal and political reform, their role as historical texts and sources of global constitutionalization, and their limitations as tools that are potentially both exclusionary and de-political. In their article, Ruth Houghton and Aoife O’Donoghue outline a role for feminist manifestos within feminist approaches to constituent power. Sheri Labenski uncovers from the archives the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom manifesto from 1924 and the outline for a ‘New International Order’. Gina Heathcote and Lucia Kula centre Lusophone African feminist action in Luanda, Angola, to problematize an approach to feminist manifestos that reiterates dominant feminisms, and instead argue for active silence by those more dominant feminist voices. In her conclusion to the special issue, Emily Jones uses posthuman feminism to interrogate and critique the claim of universality in global constitutionalism. Across this special issue, key themes emerge: the potential of inclusion and exclusion, and the role of manifesto as a method in knowledge production.
特刊导言:女权主义宣言与全球宪政
女权主义者和妇女活动家利用宣言来表达她们对法律和政治制度的不满,揭露她们在父权制、殖民主义和资本主义的生活经历中所遭受的伤害,呼吁激进的政治、法律和社会变革。本期《女性主义宣言与全球宪政》专刊探讨了女性主义宣言在全球宪政中的作用。它质疑女权主义宣言在带来法律和政治改革中的作用,它们作为历史文本和全球宪法化的来源的作用,以及它们作为潜在的排他性和非政治性工具的局限性。在她们的文章中,Ruth Houghton和Aoife O 'Donoghue概述了女权主义宣言在女权主义方法中对选民权力的作用。Sheri Labenski从档案中揭示了1924年国际妇女和平与自由联盟的宣言和“新国际秩序”的大纲。Gina Heathcote和Lucia Kula在安哥拉的罗安达(Luanda)为葡语非洲女性主义行动中心,对女权主义宣言中重复主流女权主义的做法提出质疑,并主张那些更主流的女权主义声音保持积极的沉默。在特刊的结束语中,艾米丽·琼斯运用后人类女性主义对全球宪政主义中的普遍性主张进行了质疑和批判。在本期特刊中,出现了关键主题:包容和排斥的潜力,以及宣言作为知识生产方法的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Constitutionalism
Global Constitutionalism Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信