Practical Aspects of Correlation Analysis of Compressive Strength from Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods in Different Directions

IF 2.7 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Baitollah Badarloo, Petr Lehner
{"title":"Practical Aspects of Correlation Analysis of Compressive Strength from Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods in Different Directions","authors":"Baitollah Badarloo, Petr Lehner","doi":"10.3390/infrastructures8110155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research presented here demonstrates the practical aspects of the numerical correlation of the results of the compressive strength test. The destructive test (DT) in a hydraulic press and the non-destructive test (NDT) using a Schmidt hammer in several process variations were evaluated. The aim was to evaluate the real differences between the tool supplier’s curve and testing. Therefore, 150 concrete cube specimens with an edge length of 150 mm were produced using a mixture of three types of concrete classes: C30, C35, and C40. The test was carried out 7 and 28 days of age of the concrete. The Schmidt hammer test was carried out in horizontal (θ = 0) and vertical (θ = 90) directions and using a series of 10 measurements. Furthermore, the tests were performed in two sets: first, the sample was placed on the ground, and second, under a hydraulic jack with a load of 50% of the maximum bearing capacity of specific concrete. Then, regression analysis was performed on the data sets to establish linear mathematical relationships between compressive strength and number of bounces. The results showed that the correlation between the DT and NDT tests has a high value for each group, but the correlation equations are different and must be taken into account.","PeriodicalId":13601,"journal":{"name":"Infrastructures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infrastructures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8110155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research presented here demonstrates the practical aspects of the numerical correlation of the results of the compressive strength test. The destructive test (DT) in a hydraulic press and the non-destructive test (NDT) using a Schmidt hammer in several process variations were evaluated. The aim was to evaluate the real differences between the tool supplier’s curve and testing. Therefore, 150 concrete cube specimens with an edge length of 150 mm were produced using a mixture of three types of concrete classes: C30, C35, and C40. The test was carried out 7 and 28 days of age of the concrete. The Schmidt hammer test was carried out in horizontal (θ = 0) and vertical (θ = 90) directions and using a series of 10 measurements. Furthermore, the tests were performed in two sets: first, the sample was placed on the ground, and second, under a hydraulic jack with a load of 50% of the maximum bearing capacity of specific concrete. Then, regression analysis was performed on the data sets to establish linear mathematical relationships between compressive strength and number of bounces. The results showed that the correlation between the DT and NDT tests has a high value for each group, but the correlation equations are different and must be taken into account.
破坏性和非破坏性方法在不同方向上抗压强度相关性分析的实用意义
本文的研究展示了抗压强度试验结果数值相关性的实用方面。对几种不同工艺条件下的液压机破坏试验和施密特锤无损试验进行了评价。目的是评估工具供应商的曲线和测试之间的实际差异。因此,使用C30、C35和C40三种混凝土类型的混合物制作了150个边缘长度为150mm的混凝土立方体试件。试验分别在混凝土龄期7天和28天进行。施米特锤试验在水平(θ = 0)和垂直(θ = 90)方向上进行,共10次测量。此外,试验分两组进行:一组是将样品放置在地面上,第二组是在液压千斤顶下进行,其荷载为特定混凝土最大承载能力的50%。然后对数据集进行回归分析,建立抗压强度与弹跳次数之间的线性数学关系。结果表明,每组DT与NDT试验的相关性都很高,但相关方程不同,必须加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infrastructures
Infrastructures Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信