Validation of the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) in portuguese for Brazil

Q2 Medicine
Fabiana Rosa Neves Smiderle, Stela Maris de Jezus Castro, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier, Rita Mattiello
{"title":"Validation of the regret coping scale for healthcare professionals (RCS-HCP) in portuguese for Brazil","authors":"Fabiana Rosa Neves Smiderle, Stela Maris de Jezus Castro, Delphine Sophie Courvoisier, Rita Mattiello","doi":"10.36311/jhgd.v33.13880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the assessment of the ability to cope with regret can contribute to support strategies for health professionals. However, in Brazil there are few instruments that evaluate this ability in the general context. Objective: the aim of the study was to adapt and validate the Regret Coping Scale for Healthcare Professionals (RCS-HCP) for Brazilian health professionals. Methods: in the validation, the instruments were translated, and the psychometric properties evaluated for validity and reliability. Three hundred and forty-one professionals participated, with an average age of 38.6 ± 9.2, and 87 participated in a retest survey 30 days later. Results: exploratory factor analysis showed adequacy of the structure (KMO = 0.786) composed of three factors. In the confirmation, the performance was close to acceptable. Reliability was good for the maladaptive strategies (α = 0.834) and adequate for the problem-focused strategies (α = 0.717), but slightly too low for adaptive strategies (α = 0.595). Test-retest showed lower than expected values, with a Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.703. Conclusion: the RCS-HCP scale showed satisfactory performance in relation to the properties evaluated.","PeriodicalId":35218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Growth and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36311/jhgd.v33.13880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the assessment of the ability to cope with regret can contribute to support strategies for health professionals. However, in Brazil there are few instruments that evaluate this ability in the general context. Objective: the aim of the study was to adapt and validate the Regret Coping Scale for Healthcare Professionals (RCS-HCP) for Brazilian health professionals. Methods: in the validation, the instruments were translated, and the psychometric properties evaluated for validity and reliability. Three hundred and forty-one professionals participated, with an average age of 38.6 ± 9.2, and 87 participated in a retest survey 30 days later. Results: exploratory factor analysis showed adequacy of the structure (KMO = 0.786) composed of three factors. In the confirmation, the performance was close to acceptable. Reliability was good for the maladaptive strategies (α = 0.834) and adequate for the problem-focused strategies (α = 0.717), but slightly too low for adaptive strategies (α = 0.595). Test-retest showed lower than expected values, with a Spearman-Brown coefficient of 0.703. Conclusion: the RCS-HCP scale showed satisfactory performance in relation to the properties evaluated.
巴西医疗保健专业人员后悔应对量表(RCS-HCP)葡萄牙文验证
导言:对应对后悔能力的评估有助于为卫生专业人员提供支持策略。然而,在巴西,在一般情况下评估这种能力的工具很少。目的:本研究的目的是对巴西卫生专业人员的后悔应对量表(RCS-HCP)进行调整和验证。方法:在验证中,对量表进行翻译,并对心理测量特性进行效度和信度评估。341名专业人员参与,平均年龄38.6±9.2岁,87人在30天后参加复测调查。结果:探索性因子分析显示三因素构成的结构充分性(KMO = 0.786)。在确认中,性能接近可接受。不适应策略的信度较好(α = 0.834),问题聚焦策略的信度较好(α = 0.717),而适应策略的信度略低(α = 0.595)。重测结果低于期望值,Spearman-Brown系数为0.703。结论:RCS-HCP量表具有满意的评价指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Human Growth and Development
Journal of Human Growth and Development Social Sciences-Life-span and Life-course Studies
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信