Performance of glyphosate-based products applied alone and in combination with herbicides in burndown

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY
Bruno C. S. Pereira, Guilherme B. P. Braz, Matheus de F. Souza, Laís T. R. T. Reginaldo, Camila J. B. Ferreira
{"title":"Performance of glyphosate-based products applied alone and in combination with herbicides in burndown","authors":"Bruno C. S. Pereira, Guilherme B. P. Braz, Matheus de F. Souza, Laís T. R. T. Reginaldo, Camila J. B. Ferreira","doi":"10.1590/1983-21252023v36n404rc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The no-tillage system is a conservation system that helps sustainability and agricultural production. The effectiveness of glyphosate control, applied alone or in combination with other herbicides, can be altered depending on the product’s formulation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of glyphosate in formulations containing different salts and concentrations, applied alone and in combination with other herbicides, in controlling weeds in advanced stages in the pre-sowing burndown operation. The experiment was carried out in the field in an area with a history of high weed infestation. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, evaluating eleven treatments and four replicates. The treatments consisted of the application of three glyphosate-based formulations alone and in combination with clethodim and 2,4-D amine herbicides, in addition to a control without herbicide application. The evaluated variables were percentage of weed control and percentage of desiccation. A comparison of means by contrasts was performed to analyze the percentage of weed control. In general, treatments containing products based on glyphosate potassium salt in the composition have slightly better control performance compared to those consisting of glyphosate isopropylamine salt.","PeriodicalId":21558,"journal":{"name":"Revista Caatinga","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Caatinga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252023v36n404rc","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The no-tillage system is a conservation system that helps sustainability and agricultural production. The effectiveness of glyphosate control, applied alone or in combination with other herbicides, can be altered depending on the product’s formulation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of glyphosate in formulations containing different salts and concentrations, applied alone and in combination with other herbicides, in controlling weeds in advanced stages in the pre-sowing burndown operation. The experiment was carried out in the field in an area with a history of high weed infestation. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, evaluating eleven treatments and four replicates. The treatments consisted of the application of three glyphosate-based formulations alone and in combination with clethodim and 2,4-D amine herbicides, in addition to a control without herbicide application. The evaluated variables were percentage of weed control and percentage of desiccation. A comparison of means by contrasts was performed to analyze the percentage of weed control. In general, treatments containing products based on glyphosate potassium salt in the composition have slightly better control performance compared to those consisting of glyphosate isopropylamine salt.
草甘膦基产品单独使用和与除草剂联合使用在烧毁中的性能
免耕制度是一种有助于可持续发展和农业生产的保护制度。草甘膦控制的有效性,单独使用或与其他除草剂联合使用,可以根据产品的配方而改变。本研究的目的是评估草甘膦在含有不同盐和浓度的配方中,单独使用和与其他除草剂联合使用,在播种前烧毁操作的后期控制杂草的有效性。试验是在一个杂草高发地区的田间进行的。试验采用随机区组设计,共评价11个处理和4个重复。这些处理包括单独使用三种草甘膦制剂,以及与clethodim和2,4- d胺除草剂联合使用,此外还有不使用除草剂的对照。评估变量为杂草控制百分比和干燥百分比。采用对比方法对杂草防治的百分比进行了分析。一般而言,与由草甘膦异丙胺盐组成的处理相比,在组合物中含有基于草甘膦钾盐的产品的处理具有略好的控制性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Caatinga
Revista Caatinga AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Caatinga é uma publicação científica que apresenta periodicidade trimestral, publicada pela Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação da Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido – UFERSA, desde 1976. Objetiva proporcionar à comunidade científica, publicações de alto nível nas áreas de Ciências Agrárias e Recursos Naturais, disponibilizando, integral e gratuitamente, resultados relevantes das pesquisas publicadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信