Features of answers to questions about recent events by people with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease, and healthy controls

IF 0.3 Q4 LINGUISTICS
Gareth Walker, Traci Walker, Ronan O'Malley, Bahman Mirheidari, Heidi Christensen, Markus Reuber, Daniel Blackburn
{"title":"Features of answers to questions about recent events by people with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease, and healthy controls","authors":"Gareth Walker, Traci Walker, Ronan O'Malley, Bahman Mirheidari, Heidi Christensen, Markus Reuber, Daniel Blackburn","doi":"10.1558/jircd.24511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Asking patients who have been referred to memory clinics open questions about recent events has been shown to have diagnostic relevance. Method: We use conversation analysis to look at responses to questions about recent events. The interviewees are healthy control (HC) participants, people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Results: We show differences among the groups’ use of claims of memory problems, self-directed questions, and well-prefacing. Healthy control participants produce more talk in response to all of these, while people with MCI and AD either do not, or do so in demonstrably different ways from both HC participants and each other. Discussion/conclusion: Healthy control participants are both willing and able to ‘show off’ their memory, while people with AD are willing but generally unable to do so. People with MCI, in contrast, display themselves as both unwilling and unable to engage with the agent’s questions as tests of memory.","PeriodicalId":52222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.24511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asking patients who have been referred to memory clinics open questions about recent events has been shown to have diagnostic relevance. Method: We use conversation analysis to look at responses to questions about recent events. The interviewees are healthy control (HC) participants, people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Results: We show differences among the groups’ use of claims of memory problems, self-directed questions, and well-prefacing. Healthy control participants produce more talk in response to all of these, while people with MCI and AD either do not, or do so in demonstrably different ways from both HC participants and each other. Discussion/conclusion: Healthy control participants are both willing and able to ‘show off’ their memory, while people with AD are willing but generally unable to do so. People with MCI, in contrast, display themselves as both unwilling and unable to engage with the agent’s questions as tests of memory.
轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病患者以及健康对照者对近期事件的回答特征
背景:询问被转介到记忆诊所的患者有关近期事件的开放性问题已被证明具有诊断相关性。方法:我们使用对话分析来观察对最近事件问题的回答。受访者包括健康对照组(HC)参与者、轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者。结果:我们显示各组在使用记忆问题、自我导向问题和良好的前言方面的差异。健康对照组的参与者对所有这些都做出了更多的回应,而患有轻度认知障碍和AD的人要么没有,要么以明显不同于HC参与者和彼此的方式做出回应。讨论/结论:健康对照组的参与者既愿意也能够“炫耀”他们的记忆力,而AD患者愿意但通常不能这样做。相比之下,MCI患者表现出既不愿意也无法参与代理的问题作为记忆测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders
Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信