Negotiorum gestio: Roman foundations of unauthorized management of another's affairs in Serbian civil law

Medychne pravo Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5937/ptp2303019s
Nenad Stefanović
{"title":"Negotiorum gestio: Roman foundations of unauthorized management of another's affairs in Serbian civil law","authors":"Nenad Stefanović","doi":"10.5937/ptp2303019s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Negotiorum gestio is a legal institute that originates from Roman law. It still exists today and in the legal literature we find a term that defines it as: the unauthorized performance of another's affairs, i.e., agency without authority. The institute of negotiorum gestio has been continuously used and is the subject of legal regulation in most countries of the continental, European legal systems, including the law of the Republic of Serbia, for more than two millennia. The aim of this paper is to compare the solutions from Roman and contemporary law of obligations using the normative, descriptive, comparative and analytical-synthetic scientific methods. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part, which deals with the Roman understanding of the negotiorum gestio institute, the second part, which presents the current solutions regarding this institute contained in the Law of Contract and Torts of the Republic of Serbia, and the third part, which, using a comparative and the historical method, draws conclusions about whether current solutions contained in contemporary law are better than those that were applied in the ancient period.","PeriodicalId":91928,"journal":{"name":"Medychne pravo","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medychne pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2303019s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negotiorum gestio is a legal institute that originates from Roman law. It still exists today and in the legal literature we find a term that defines it as: the unauthorized performance of another's affairs, i.e., agency without authority. The institute of negotiorum gestio has been continuously used and is the subject of legal regulation in most countries of the continental, European legal systems, including the law of the Republic of Serbia, for more than two millennia. The aim of this paper is to compare the solutions from Roman and contemporary law of obligations using the normative, descriptive, comparative and analytical-synthetic scientific methods. The paper is divided into three parts: the first part, which deals with the Roman understanding of the negotiorum gestio institute, the second part, which presents the current solutions regarding this institute contained in the Law of Contract and Torts of the Republic of Serbia, and the third part, which, using a comparative and the historical method, draws conclusions about whether current solutions contained in contemporary law are better than those that were applied in the ancient period.
在塞尔维亚民法中,罗马人对他人事务的未经授权管理的基础
协商制是一种源于罗马法的法律制度。它今天仍然存在,在法律文献中,我们发现一个术语将其定义为:未经授权执行他人事务,即没有授权的代理。两千多年来,在欧洲大陆法律体系的大多数国家,包括塞尔维亚共和国的法律中,一直在继续使用协商问题研究所,并将其作为法律管理的主题。本文的目的是运用规范性、描述性、比较性和分析-综合的科学方法,比较罗马和当代义务法的解决方案。本文分为三个部分:第一部分,涉及罗马人对协商权的理解,第二部分,介绍塞尔维亚共和国《合同和侵权法》中关于这一制度的当前解决方案,第三部分,使用比较和历史的方法,得出结论,当代法律中包含的当前解决方案是否比古代适用的解决方案更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信