A Comparative Study of Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy (FOL) and Indirect Laryngoscopy in the Diagnosis of Patients with Vocal Cord Lesions

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Mohammad Nazrul Islam, Dipankar Lodh, Md Shahriar Islam, Md Arifuzzaman, Bashudev Kumar Saha, Md Shah Alam
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy (FOL) and Indirect Laryngoscopy in the Diagnosis of Patients with Vocal Cord Lesions","authors":"Mohammad Nazrul Islam, Dipankar Lodh, Md Shahriar Islam, Md Arifuzzaman, Bashudev Kumar Saha, Md Shah Alam","doi":"10.3329/bjo.v29i1.68129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Change of voice is one of the common complaints in ENT practice and hoarseness of voice is the commonest symptom of changed voice quality. Hoarseness is invariably the earliest manifestation of conditions directly or indirectly affecting the voice apparatus. Though most common causes of hoarseness are benign and vocal abuse is the commonest among them, but we should always investigate for more sinister pathology like malignancy. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yields of fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) with that of indirect laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of vocal cord lesions. Objectives: To compare fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) and indirect laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of vocal cord lesions as the cause of voice change. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study which has been conducted in the Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, SSMC Mitford Hospital with a sample size of 87 cases for a period of six months from 10th February’ 2020 to 9th August’ 2020. The patients with vocal cord lesions were selected according to the eligibility criteria by purposive sampling. Results : On indirect laryngoscopic examinations, 29.89% were vocal cord polyp, 16.09% suspected vocal cord neoplasm, 14.94% vocal cord edema, 11.49% vocal cord nodule, 5.74% vocal cord palsy and 2.61 were ulcerative lesion of vocal cords whereas poor view were in 18.39% cases. On fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL), 29.89% were vocal cord polyp, 19.54% suspected vocal cord neoplasm, 17.24% vocal cord edema, 16.09% vocal cord nodule, 8.04% vocal cord palsy and 6.90% were ulcerative lesion of vocal cord. 2.30% revealed normal study. Study showed that fibreoptic laryngoscopic examination is superior to indirect laryngoscopy in diagnosing vocal cord lesions. Conclusion : Fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) is significantly superior to indirect laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of vocal cord lesions. Indirect laryngoscopy sometimes may miss to diagnose a sinister disease like malignancy. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 29(1): 24-31","PeriodicalId":53915,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v29i1.68129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Change of voice is one of the common complaints in ENT practice and hoarseness of voice is the commonest symptom of changed voice quality. Hoarseness is invariably the earliest manifestation of conditions directly or indirectly affecting the voice apparatus. Though most common causes of hoarseness are benign and vocal abuse is the commonest among them, but we should always investigate for more sinister pathology like malignancy. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yields of fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) with that of indirect laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of vocal cord lesions. Objectives: To compare fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) and indirect laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of vocal cord lesions as the cause of voice change. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study which has been conducted in the Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery, SSMC Mitford Hospital with a sample size of 87 cases for a period of six months from 10th February’ 2020 to 9th August’ 2020. The patients with vocal cord lesions were selected according to the eligibility criteria by purposive sampling. Results : On indirect laryngoscopic examinations, 29.89% were vocal cord polyp, 16.09% suspected vocal cord neoplasm, 14.94% vocal cord edema, 11.49% vocal cord nodule, 5.74% vocal cord palsy and 2.61 were ulcerative lesion of vocal cords whereas poor view were in 18.39% cases. On fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL), 29.89% were vocal cord polyp, 19.54% suspected vocal cord neoplasm, 17.24% vocal cord edema, 16.09% vocal cord nodule, 8.04% vocal cord palsy and 6.90% were ulcerative lesion of vocal cord. 2.30% revealed normal study. Study showed that fibreoptic laryngoscopic examination is superior to indirect laryngoscopy in diagnosing vocal cord lesions. Conclusion : Fibreoptic laryngoscopy (FOL) is significantly superior to indirect laryngoscopy in the diagnosis of vocal cord lesions. Indirect laryngoscopy sometimes may miss to diagnose a sinister disease like malignancy. Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 29(1): 24-31
纤维喉镜与间接喉镜在声带病变诊断中的比较研究
背景:音变是耳鼻喉科常见的主诉之一,声音嘶哑是音质改变最常见的症状。声音嘶哑总是直接或间接影响发声器官的最早表现。虽然声音嘶哑最常见的原因是良性的,其中最常见的是声音滥用,但我们应该经常调查更险恶的病理,如恶性肿瘤。本研究的目的是比较纤维喉镜(FOL)与间接喉镜在声带病变诊断中的诊断率。目的:比较纤维喉镜(FOL)与间接喉镜(间接喉镜)对声带病变的诊断价值。方法:这是一项横断面研究,在SSMC Mitford医院耳鼻喉科和头颈外科进行,样本量为87例,时间为2020年2月10日至2020年8月9日,为期6个月。采用有目的抽样的方法,根据入选标准选取声带病变患者。结果:间接喉镜检查中,29.89%为声带息肉,16.09%为疑似声带肿瘤,14.94%为声带水肿,11.49%为声带结节,5.74%为声带麻痹,2.61%为声带溃疡性病变,18.39%为视野不佳。纤维喉镜检查中,29.89%为声带息肉,19.54%为疑似声带肿瘤,17.24%为声带水肿,16.09%为声带小结,8.04%为声带麻痹,6.90%为声带溃疡性病变。2.30%显示正常。研究表明,纤维喉镜检查在诊断声带病变方面优于间接喉镜检查。结论:纤维喉镜对声带病变的诊断明显优于间接喉镜。间接喉镜检查有时可能误诊恶性肿瘤等恶性疾病。孟加拉国[J] otorhinolyngol 2023;(1): 29日24-31
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信