COLORISM BEFORE AND AFTER THE ONE DROP RULE

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Robert L. Reece
{"title":"COLORISM BEFORE AND AFTER THE ONE DROP RULE","authors":"Robert L. Reece","doi":"10.1080/15427609.2023.2262347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson changed the United States from a color-focused society to a race-focused society and stripped the privileged formal status from mulattos. Black identity was flattened to what we know today: a collective identity with rampant color stratification. While research on colorism has expanded, we need to understand how contemporary colorism evolved from the systems of the past. I use Census microdata from 1870 and 1920 and regression analysis to examine colorism before and after the one-drop-rule. I reveal that colorism worsened after the one-drop-rule, and mulattos tried even harder to preserve their distinct identity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47096,"journal":{"name":"Research in Human Development","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2023.2262347","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson changed the United States from a color-focused society to a race-focused society and stripped the privileged formal status from mulattos. Black identity was flattened to what we know today: a collective identity with rampant color stratification. While research on colorism has expanded, we need to understand how contemporary colorism evolved from the systems of the past. I use Census microdata from 1870 and 1920 and regression analysis to examine colorism before and after the one-drop-rule. I reveal that colorism worsened after the one-drop-rule, and mulattos tried even harder to preserve their distinct identity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
一滴规则前后的肤色差异
摘要普莱西诉弗格森案的判决使美国从一个以肤色为中心的社会转变为一个以种族为中心的社会,剥夺了黑白混血儿的特权地位。黑人身份被夷为平地,变成了我们今天所知道的样子:一种带有猖獗的肤色分层的集体身份。虽然对色彩主义的研究已经扩大,但我们需要了解当代色彩主义是如何从过去的系统演变而来的。我使用1870年和1920年的人口普查微观数据和回归分析来检验“一滴规则”前后的肤色歧视。我揭示了在“一滴规则”之后,种族歧视变得更加严重,而黑白混血儿则更加努力地保持自己独特的身份。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in Human Development
Research in Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信