Literary Attacks on Thornton Wilder

Stephen J. Rojcewicz Jr.
{"title":"Literary Attacks on Thornton Wilder","authors":"Stephen J. Rojcewicz Jr.","doi":"10.5325/thorntonwilderj.4.1.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having been attacked by the Marxist critic Michael Gold in 1930 for ostensibly ignoring the social issues of the day, and by Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson in 1942 and 1943 with accusations insinuating plagiarism, Thornton Wilder responded primarily as a creative writer. Although his plays and novels reflect his own literary goals, some passages include subtle responses to his critics. His prefaces, personal correspondence, and memoranda for his attorneys directly responded to the accusations. The attacks, at times ad hominem and homophobic, and often made in bad faith, had consequences. Wilder experienced astonishment, disgust, and personal distress. As a result of one controversy, The Skin of Our Teeth failed to win the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award. Nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949, Wilder did not win, an outcome some critics attribute to these controversies. Wilder reacted to these attacks in the same way he lived his life and composed his writings, with poise, dignity, sensitivity, creativity, and an affirmation of human freedom.","PeriodicalId":478170,"journal":{"name":"Thornton Wilder journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thornton Wilder journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/thorntonwilderj.4.1.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Having been attacked by the Marxist critic Michael Gold in 1930 for ostensibly ignoring the social issues of the day, and by Joseph Campbell and Henry Morton Robinson in 1942 and 1943 with accusations insinuating plagiarism, Thornton Wilder responded primarily as a creative writer. Although his plays and novels reflect his own literary goals, some passages include subtle responses to his critics. His prefaces, personal correspondence, and memoranda for his attorneys directly responded to the accusations. The attacks, at times ad hominem and homophobic, and often made in bad faith, had consequences. Wilder experienced astonishment, disgust, and personal distress. As a result of one controversy, The Skin of Our Teeth failed to win the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award. Nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1949, Wilder did not win, an outcome some critics attribute to these controversies. Wilder reacted to these attacks in the same way he lived his life and composed his writings, with poise, dignity, sensitivity, creativity, and an affirmation of human freedom.
对桑顿·怀尔德的文学攻击
1930年,马克思主义评论家迈克尔·戈尔德(Michael Gold)指责他表面上忽视了当时的社会问题,1942年和1943年,约瑟夫·坎贝尔(Joseph Campbell)和亨利·莫顿·罗宾逊(Henry Morton Robinson)指责他抄袭,桑顿·怀尔德对此的回应主要是作为一个有创造力的作家。虽然他的戏剧和小说反映了他自己的文学目标,但有些段落包含了对他的批评的微妙回应。他的序言、私人信件和给律师的备忘录直接回应了这些指控。这些攻击,有时是人身攻击和仇视同性恋,而且往往是恶意的,产生了后果。怀尔德感到惊讶、厌恶和个人痛苦。由于一次争议,《我们牙齿的皮肤》未能获得纽约戏剧评论界奖。1949年,怀尔德被提名诺贝尔文学奖,但没有获奖,一些评论家将这一结果归因于这些争议。怀尔德对这些攻击的反应与他生活和写作的方式一样:沉着、尊严、敏感、创造力,以及对人类自由的肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信