Development and Validation of the Sources of Research Self-Efficacy Scale

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Eli A. Jones, Justine Piontek, Luke C. Walden, Leigh M. Harrell-Williams
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Sources of Research Self-Efficacy Scale","authors":"Eli A. Jones, Justine Piontek, Luke C. Walden, Leigh M. Harrell-Williams","doi":"10.1177/07342829231204507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research self-efficacy is a key component of college students’ career development. This study’s purpose was to develop and begin to construct a validity argument for scores from the Sources of Research Self-Efficacy (SRSE) scale in college students. We explored validity evidence for SRSE scores from 719 undergraduate and graduate students based on test content, response processes, internal structure, relations to related variables, and consequences of testing. We present evidence from our development process for test content and response processes. Our statistical analyses suggest that a 20-item four-factor model is appropriate, with subscales representing Mastery Experiences, Vicarious Experiences, Social Persuasion, and Negative Emotional States. Subscale scores showed good internal consistency and correlated with both global research self-efficacy and research outcome expectancy scores. The SRSE shows promise as a measure of the various learning experiences that lead to students’ research self-efficacy in university settings.","PeriodicalId":51446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829231204507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research self-efficacy is a key component of college students’ career development. This study’s purpose was to develop and begin to construct a validity argument for scores from the Sources of Research Self-Efficacy (SRSE) scale in college students. We explored validity evidence for SRSE scores from 719 undergraduate and graduate students based on test content, response processes, internal structure, relations to related variables, and consequences of testing. We present evidence from our development process for test content and response processes. Our statistical analyses suggest that a 20-item four-factor model is appropriate, with subscales representing Mastery Experiences, Vicarious Experiences, Social Persuasion, and Negative Emotional States. Subscale scores showed good internal consistency and correlated with both global research self-efficacy and research outcome expectancy scores. The SRSE shows promise as a measure of the various learning experiences that lead to students’ research self-efficacy in university settings.
自我效能感量表研究来源的编制与验证
研究自我效能感是大学生职业发展的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是发展并开始构建大学生研究自我效能感来源(SRSE)量表得分的效度论证。我们根据测试内容、反应过程、内部结构、与相关变量的关系以及测试结果,对719名本科生和研究生的SRSE分数进行了效度证据探索。我们从测试内容和响应过程的开发过程中提供证据。我们的统计分析表明,一个20项的四因素模型是合适的,其中子量表代表掌握体验、替代体验、社会说服和消极情绪状态。子量表得分具有良好的内部一致性,并与整体研究自我效能和研究结果期望得分相关。在大学环境中,SRSE显示了作为导致学生研究自我效能感的各种学习经历的衡量标准的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (JPA) publishes contemporary and important information focusing on psychological and educational assessment research and evidence-based practices as well as assessment instrumentation. JPA is well known internationally for the quality of published assessment-related research, theory and practice papers, and book and test reviews. The methodologically sound and impiricially-based studies and critical test and book reviews will be of particular interest to all assessment specialists including practicing psychologists, psychoeducational consultants, educational diagnosticians and special educators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信