Food waste supply and behaviour towards its alternative uses in Kampala city, Uganda

IF 4.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Geoffrey Ssepuuya, Elsie Nsiyona, Moses Kakungulu, Jane Frances Alowo, Paul Nampala
{"title":"Food waste supply and behaviour towards its alternative uses in Kampala city, Uganda","authors":"Geoffrey Ssepuuya, Elsie Nsiyona, Moses Kakungulu, Jane Frances Alowo, Paul Nampala","doi":"10.1186/s42834-023-00195-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Solid waste management is a major challenge in sub-Saharan Africa in general and its food waste component is high and increasing with the rapidly increasing population. Survey data (class p1) collected from households, hotels, restaurants, schools and produce markets were analysed using descriptive and logistic regression analyses for insights into the types and amounts of food waste, and respondents’ attitudes and practices towards its collection, disposal and alternative uses. Households produce the highest amounts of food waste compared to institutions (hotels, schools and restaurants) and produce markets. In a week, about 96, 72, and 93% of all the respondents in households, institutions and produce markets respectively experienced food waste at least one to three times. On average, with a solid waste collection coverage of 45%, households, institutions and markets in Kampala can respectively supply 680, 80, and 8 t of food waste daily. Moulding, poor food storage, food leftovers, food expiry and excess food produce were the major reasons for condemning food to waste. Over 90% of the respondents recognized food waste as a problem, and as a resource especially for use in livestock feed production, and were willing to consume house crickets raised on feed from food waste. Lower levels of education (none, primary and secondary levels), unemployment, and being divorced at household level were positively associated with recognizing food waste as a resource [X 2 (21, N = 209) = 137.77, p = < 0.0001] and re-use for alternative purposes [X 2 (21, N = 209) = 47.44, p = 0.001] by households and institutions [X 2 (14, N = 92) = 30.97, p = < 0.019]. Majority of the respondents were willing to donate food waste, especially married people and institutions that have been in existence for a period of 5–10 years.","PeriodicalId":22130,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment Research","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-023-00195-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Solid waste management is a major challenge in sub-Saharan Africa in general and its food waste component is high and increasing with the rapidly increasing population. Survey data (class p1) collected from households, hotels, restaurants, schools and produce markets were analysed using descriptive and logistic regression analyses for insights into the types and amounts of food waste, and respondents’ attitudes and practices towards its collection, disposal and alternative uses. Households produce the highest amounts of food waste compared to institutions (hotels, schools and restaurants) and produce markets. In a week, about 96, 72, and 93% of all the respondents in households, institutions and produce markets respectively experienced food waste at least one to three times. On average, with a solid waste collection coverage of 45%, households, institutions and markets in Kampala can respectively supply 680, 80, and 8 t of food waste daily. Moulding, poor food storage, food leftovers, food expiry and excess food produce were the major reasons for condemning food to waste. Over 90% of the respondents recognized food waste as a problem, and as a resource especially for use in livestock feed production, and were willing to consume house crickets raised on feed from food waste. Lower levels of education (none, primary and secondary levels), unemployment, and being divorced at household level were positively associated with recognizing food waste as a resource [X 2 (21, N = 209) = 137.77, p = < 0.0001] and re-use for alternative purposes [X 2 (21, N = 209) = 47.44, p = 0.001] by households and institutions [X 2 (14, N = 92) = 30.97, p = < 0.019]. Majority of the respondents were willing to donate food waste, especially married people and institutions that have been in existence for a period of 5–10 years.
乌干达坎帕拉市的食物垃圾供应及其替代用途
固体废物管理是撒哈拉以南非洲地区的一个主要挑战,其食物废物成分很高,并且随着人口的快速增长而增加。从家庭、酒店、餐馆、学校和农产品市场收集的调查数据(p1类)使用描述性和逻辑回归分析来分析食物浪费的类型和数量,以及受访者对其收集、处置和替代用途的态度和做法。与机构(酒店、学校和餐馆)和农产品市场相比,家庭产生的食物浪费最多。在一周内,约有96%的家庭受访者、72%的机构受访者和93%的农产品市场受访者分别经历了至少一至三次的食物浪费。平均而言,坎帕拉的固体废物收集覆盖率为45%,家庭、机构和市场每天分别可以提供680吨、80吨和8吨食物垃圾。霉变、食物储存不良、食物剩菜、食物过期和食物生产过剩是导致食物浪费的主要原因。超过90%的受访者认为食物垃圾是一个问题,并且是一种特别用于牲畜饲料生产的资源,并且愿意食用用食物垃圾饲料饲养的蟋蟀。较低的教育水平(小学和中学水平)、失业和家庭离异与将食物浪费视为一种资源呈正相关[X 2 (21, N = 209) = 137.77, p = <0.0001]和家庭和机构的替代用途再利用[x2 (21, N = 209) = 47.44, p = 0.001] [x2 (14, N = 92) = 30.97, p = <0.019]。大多数受访者愿意捐赠食物垃圾,尤其是已婚人士和已经存在5-10年的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary goal of Sustainable Environment Research (SER) is to publish high quality research articles associated with sustainable environmental science and technology and to contribute to improving environmental practice. The scope of SER includes issues of environmental science, technology, management and related fields, especially in response to sustainable water, energy and other natural resources. Potential topics include, but are not limited to: 1. Water and Wastewater • Biological processes • Physical and chemical processes • Watershed management • Advanced and innovative treatment 2. Soil and Groundwater Pollution • Contaminant fate and transport processes • Contaminant site investigation technology • Soil and groundwater remediation technology • Risk assessment in contaminant sites 3. Air Pollution and Climate Change • Ambient air quality management • Greenhouse gases control • Gaseous and particulate pollution control • Indoor air quality management and control 4. Waste Management • Waste reduction and minimization • Recourse recovery and conservation • Solid waste treatment technology and disposal 5. Energy and Resources • Sustainable energy • Local, regional and global sustainability • Environmental management system • Life-cycle assessment • Environmental policy instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信