Examining the facilitators of I4.0 practices to attain stakeholders’ collaboration: a circular perspective

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Ashish Dwivedi, Shefali Srivastava, Dindayal Agrawal, Suchi Dubey, Tripti Singh, Saurabh Pratap
{"title":"Examining the facilitators of I4.0 practices to attain stakeholders’ collaboration: a circular perspective","authors":"Ashish Dwivedi, Shefali Srivastava, Dindayal Agrawal, Suchi Dubey, Tripti Singh, Saurabh Pratap","doi":"10.1080/21693277.2023.2266643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fourth industrial revolution (I4.0) has changed the traditional business model, bringing various benefits, including increased efficiency and productivity in organizations. However, to attain success in I4.0 practices requires collaboration from various stakeholders. This study objectives to identify the facilitators of I4.0 practices that can lead to successful collaboration among stakeholders from a circular perspective. An extensive literature review is performed to identify 14 potential facilitators. Further, the study adopts a mixed methodology of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to analyze the interconnectedness among the identified facilitators. BWM method was used to determine the relative importance of the identified facilitators, while ISM technique was used to determine the relationships between the facilitators of I4.0 practices. The findings from the study reveal that to strengthen stakeholder collaboration, organizations need to focus more on training and capacity-building programs and create more opportunities for technology exchange.","PeriodicalId":37891,"journal":{"name":"Production and Manufacturing Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production and Manufacturing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2023.2266643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution (I4.0) has changed the traditional business model, bringing various benefits, including increased efficiency and productivity in organizations. However, to attain success in I4.0 practices requires collaboration from various stakeholders. This study objectives to identify the facilitators of I4.0 practices that can lead to successful collaboration among stakeholders from a circular perspective. An extensive literature review is performed to identify 14 potential facilitators. Further, the study adopts a mixed methodology of Best-Worst Method (BWM) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) to analyze the interconnectedness among the identified facilitators. BWM method was used to determine the relative importance of the identified facilitators, while ISM technique was used to determine the relationships between the facilitators of I4.0 practices. The findings from the study reveal that to strengthen stakeholder collaboration, organizations need to focus more on training and capacity-building programs and create more opportunities for technology exchange.
考察工业4.0实践的促进因素,以实现利益相关者的合作:循环视角
第四次工业革命(I4.0)改变了传统的商业模式,带来了各种好处,包括提高了组织的效率和生产力。然而,要在工业4.0实践中取得成功,需要来自不同利益相关者的合作。本研究旨在从循环的角度确定工业4.0实践的促进因素,这些实践可以导致利益相关者之间的成功合作。广泛的文献回顾进行了确定14个潜在的促进因素。此外,本研究采用最佳-最差方法(Best-Worst Method, BWM)与解释结构模型(Interpretive Structural Modeling, ISM)相结合的方法,分析所识别的促进因素之间的关联性。BWM方法用于确定确定的促进因素的相对重要性,而ISM技术用于确定工业4.0实践的促进因素之间的关系。研究结果表明,为了加强利益相关者的合作,组织需要更多地关注培训和能力建设项目,并为技术交流创造更多机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Production and Manufacturing Research
Production and Manufacturing Research Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Production & Manufacturing Research: An Open Access Journal provides a high-quality platform for academics, researchers, and industrial practitioners working on production and manufacturing research topics to publish their work globally under a fully open access model. The journal ensures that every article undergoes a rigorous but rapid peer review process by a team of experts who share the cross-disciplinary scope of the publication. The intent is to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the field whilst maintaining a defined and relevant audience for the topics and findings reported. The journal encourages the submission of original articles, reviews, short communications and case studies in all areas of manufacturing engineering and technology, operations research and management, supply chain performance management, lean manufacturing, production systems and automation, quality control, logistics, research methodologies, manufacturing strategy, sustainable engineering, project management & scheduling and cross-disciplinary research between these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信