Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Combined with Hormone Replacement Therapy Protocol Improves the Live Birth Rate in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles for Patients without Endometriosis

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yu Wang, Huixia Xie, Ping Shen, Qun Lv
{"title":"Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Combined with Hormone Replacement Therapy Protocol Improves the Live Birth Rate in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles for Patients without Endometriosis","authors":"Yu Wang, Huixia Xie, Ping Shen, Qun Lv","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5008171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pituitary suppression improves clinical outcomes in non-endometriosis patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer remains controversial. The objective of this study is to investigate whether GnRHa combined with hormone replacement treatment (HRT) compared to HRT alone can improve the clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients without endometriosis. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. This study involved 2178 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of non-endometriosis patients between January 2018 and December 2019, of these cycles, 1535 were GnRHa-HRT combined cycles and 643 were HRT alone cycles. The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. SPSS software (version 23.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Results: Single-factor analysis showed that the live birth and implantation rates -were higher in the GnRHa-HRT group than those in the HRT group (p < 0.05). The mid-to-late-term miscarriage rate in the GnRHa-HRT group was lower than that in the HRT group (p < 0.05). The rates of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) positivity, clinical pregnancy, early abortion, multiple pregnancy, and preterm delivery between the two groups were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that rate of the live birth in the GnRHa-HRT group was higher than in the HRT group (p = 0.009), and there was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (p = 0.103). Conclusions: This large-scale retrospective study revealed that non-endometriosis women in FET cycles may benefit from the GnRHa downregulation due to increasing the live birth rate.","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5008171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pituitary suppression improves clinical outcomes in non-endometriosis patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer remains controversial. The objective of this study is to investigate whether GnRHa combined with hormone replacement treatment (HRT) compared to HRT alone can improve the clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients without endometriosis. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. This study involved 2178 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles of non-endometriosis patients between January 2018 and December 2019, of these cycles, 1535 were GnRHa-HRT combined cycles and 643 were HRT alone cycles. The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. SPSS software (version 23.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Results: Single-factor analysis showed that the live birth and implantation rates -were higher in the GnRHa-HRT group than those in the HRT group (p < 0.05). The mid-to-late-term miscarriage rate in the GnRHa-HRT group was lower than that in the HRT group (p < 0.05). The rates of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) positivity, clinical pregnancy, early abortion, multiple pregnancy, and preterm delivery between the two groups were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that rate of the live birth in the GnRHa-HRT group was higher than in the HRT group (p = 0.009), and there was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups (p = 0.103). Conclusions: This large-scale retrospective study revealed that non-endometriosis women in FET cycles may benefit from the GnRHa downregulation due to increasing the live birth rate.
促性腺激素释放激素激动剂联合激素替代治疗方案提高无子宫内膜异位症患者冻融胚胎移植周期的活产率
背景:促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)垂体抑制是否能改善非子宫内膜异位症冷冻胚胎移植患者的临床预后仍存在争议。本研究的目的是探讨GnRHa联合激素替代治疗(HRT)与单独HRT相比,是否可以改善无子宫内膜异位症患者冻融胚胎移植的临床结果。方法:回顾性队列研究。本研究涉及2018年1月至2019年12月期间非子宫内膜异位症患者的2178个冷冻解冻胚胎移植(FET)周期,其中1535个周期为GnRHa-HRT联合周期,643个周期为HRT单独周期。主要结局为临床妊娠率和活产率。采用SPSS软件(version 23.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA)进行数据分析。结果:单因素分析显示,GnRHa-HRT组的活产率和着床率均高于HRT组(p <0.05)。gnha -HRT组中晚期流产率低于HRT组(p <0.05)。两组间的人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)阳性、临床妊娠、早流产、多胎妊娠和早产率具有可比性。多因素logistic回归分析显示,GnRHa-HRT组活产率高于HRT组(p = 0.009),两组临床妊娠率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.103)。结论:这项大规模回顾性研究显示,FET周期的非子宫内膜异位症女性可能因活产率增加而受益于GnRHa下调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信