Assessing the impact of multisensory attributes of Textile-based Assistive Devices (TADs) on the experiences of end-users

Kate Kate Annett-Hitchcock, Kate Nartker, Anne Porterfield
{"title":"Assessing the impact of multisensory attributes of Textile-based Assistive Devices (TADs) on the experiences of end-users","authors":"Kate Kate Annett-Hitchcock, Kate Nartker, Anne Porterfield","doi":"10.15406/jteft.2023.09.00343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers have defined and measured functional attributes of assistive devices, yet there are multiple dimensions of a device worn temporarily or for life that remain unexamined. The purpose of this study was to explore how the sensory attributes of assistive devices impact consumers in order to build a foundation for a holistic approach to product development. Two online surveys targeting wearers of textile-based assistive devices (TADs) (n=29) and caregivers (n=8) were used for data collection. Survey questions related to sensory experiences (visual, tactile, auditory, olfactory) and describe how device usage and purchasing was impacted. Results suggest that multisensory experiences of users and caregivers involve more complexity than functionality alone. Multisensory effects were diverse in both groups. Some expressed a desire for their device to be more visible and expressive, while others chose not to use, expressing fear of judgment based on visibility. Insight into multisensory aesthetics and how design can be used to conceal, reveal, or provide opportunities for self-expression, as well as avoid embarrassment for the wearer, will help designers understand how assistive devices can be improved and developed to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities. Findings suggest that existing measures of success should include questions about sensory attributes.","PeriodicalId":17152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jteft.2023.09.00343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have defined and measured functional attributes of assistive devices, yet there are multiple dimensions of a device worn temporarily or for life that remain unexamined. The purpose of this study was to explore how the sensory attributes of assistive devices impact consumers in order to build a foundation for a holistic approach to product development. Two online surveys targeting wearers of textile-based assistive devices (TADs) (n=29) and caregivers (n=8) were used for data collection. Survey questions related to sensory experiences (visual, tactile, auditory, olfactory) and describe how device usage and purchasing was impacted. Results suggest that multisensory experiences of users and caregivers involve more complexity than functionality alone. Multisensory effects were diverse in both groups. Some expressed a desire for their device to be more visible and expressive, while others chose not to use, expressing fear of judgment based on visibility. Insight into multisensory aesthetics and how design can be used to conceal, reveal, or provide opportunities for self-expression, as well as avoid embarrassment for the wearer, will help designers understand how assistive devices can be improved and developed to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities. Findings suggest that existing measures of success should include questions about sensory attributes.
评估基于纺织品的辅助设备(TADs)的多感官属性对最终用户体验的影响
研究人员已经定义并测量了辅助设备的功能属性,但暂时或终身佩戴的设备仍有多个维度未被检查。本研究的目的是探讨辅助器具的感官属性如何影响消费者,以便为产品开发的整体方法建立基础。两项针对纺织品辅助装置(TADs)佩戴者(n=29)和护理者(n=8)的在线调查用于数据收集。调查与感官体验(视觉、触觉、听觉、嗅觉)相关的问题,并描述设备的使用和购买是如何受到影响的。结果表明,用户和照顾者的多感官体验比单独的功能更复杂。两组的多感官效应各不相同。一些人表示希望他们的设备更显眼,更有表现力,而另一些人则选择不使用,因为他们害怕基于可见性的评判。对多感官美学的洞察,以及设计如何被用来隐藏、展示或提供自我表达的机会,以及避免给佩戴者带来尴尬,将有助于设计师理解如何改进和开发辅助设备,以满足残疾人的需求。研究结果表明,现有的成功衡量标准应该包括有关感官属性的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信