COMPARISON OF BODY COMPOSITION METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BODY FAT PERCENTAGE IN LOWER LIMB PROSTHESIS USERS

Q3 Medicine
John Smith, Gary Guerra, T. Brock Symons, Eun Hye Kwon, Eun-Jung Yoon
{"title":"COMPARISON OF BODY COMPOSITION METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BODY FAT PERCENTAGE IN LOWER LIMB PROSTHESIS USERS","authors":"John Smith, Gary Guerra, T. Brock Symons, Eun Hye Kwon, Eun-Jung Yoon","doi":"10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.41605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of literature evaluating the accuracy of Air Displacement Plethysmography (ADP) compared to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for assessing body composition in individuals with lower limb amputations. Validity of ADP in persons with lower limb amputations must be established. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare body composition in persons with lower limb amputations using the BOD POD® and DXA. METHODOLOGY: Body composition was performed on eleven lower limb prosthesis users (age 53.2±14.3 years, weight 81.9±22.3kg) using ADP and DXA with and without prosthesis. FINDINGS: Repeated measures ANOVA indicated no significant difference in body composition among and between trials, F(3,8)= 3.36, p= 0.075. There were no significant differences in Body Fat (BF) percentage with and without prostheses on the BOD POD (28.5±15.7% and 33.7±12.1%, respectively) nor the DXA (32.9±10.6% and 32.0±9.9%, respectively). Association between the BOD POD and DXA were greatest when prostheses were not worn compared to when they were worn. Bland-Altman plots indicate agreement between BOD POD® and DXA was greatest while wearing the prosthesis. CONCLUSION: This study is a first to compare total body fat percent between the BOD POD® and DXA in lower limb prosthesis users. BOD POD® report valid indices of BF%. Future work will utilize the BOD POD® in intervention studies for monitoring body composition changes across the continuum of rehabilitation. Layman's Abstract Measurement of body composition is helpful in understanding the health of persons with lower limb prosthesis. The gold standard method of body composition assessment is through Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). This method can be costly and is less economical than Air Displacement Plethysmography (ADP). The aim of this research was to explore the accuracy of the ADP using a BOD POD® instrument in lower limb prosthesis wearers. Body composition measurements using the BOD POD® and DXA were administered. Assessments were performed while wearing and not wearing the prosthesis. Results indicate that no differences between the two body composition assessment methods either with or without prosthesis. The less costly ADP technology may be utilized for body composition in lower limb prosthesis users. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/41605/32165 How To Cite: Smith JD, Guerra G, Symons TB, Kwon EH, Yoon EJ. Comparison of body composition methods for estimating body fat percentage in lower limb prosthesis users. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2023; Volume 6, Issue 1, No.2. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.41605 Corresponding Author: Gary Guerra, PhD Department of Exercise and Sport Science, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, Texas, USA.E-Mail: gguerra5@stmarytx.eduORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-4616","PeriodicalId":32763,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","volume":"81 17","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.41605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of literature evaluating the accuracy of Air Displacement Plethysmography (ADP) compared to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for assessing body composition in individuals with lower limb amputations. Validity of ADP in persons with lower limb amputations must be established. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare body composition in persons with lower limb amputations using the BOD POD® and DXA. METHODOLOGY: Body composition was performed on eleven lower limb prosthesis users (age 53.2±14.3 years, weight 81.9±22.3kg) using ADP and DXA with and without prosthesis. FINDINGS: Repeated measures ANOVA indicated no significant difference in body composition among and between trials, F(3,8)= 3.36, p= 0.075. There were no significant differences in Body Fat (BF) percentage with and without prostheses on the BOD POD (28.5±15.7% and 33.7±12.1%, respectively) nor the DXA (32.9±10.6% and 32.0±9.9%, respectively). Association between the BOD POD and DXA were greatest when prostheses were not worn compared to when they were worn. Bland-Altman plots indicate agreement between BOD POD® and DXA was greatest while wearing the prosthesis. CONCLUSION: This study is a first to compare total body fat percent between the BOD POD® and DXA in lower limb prosthesis users. BOD POD® report valid indices of BF%. Future work will utilize the BOD POD® in intervention studies for monitoring body composition changes across the continuum of rehabilitation. Layman's Abstract Measurement of body composition is helpful in understanding the health of persons with lower limb prosthesis. The gold standard method of body composition assessment is through Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). This method can be costly and is less economical than Air Displacement Plethysmography (ADP). The aim of this research was to explore the accuracy of the ADP using a BOD POD® instrument in lower limb prosthesis wearers. Body composition measurements using the BOD POD® and DXA were administered. Assessments were performed while wearing and not wearing the prosthesis. Results indicate that no differences between the two body composition assessment methods either with or without prosthesis. The less costly ADP technology may be utilized for body composition in lower limb prosthesis users. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/41605/32165 How To Cite: Smith JD, Guerra G, Symons TB, Kwon EH, Yoon EJ. Comparison of body composition methods for estimating body fat percentage in lower limb prosthesis users. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2023; Volume 6, Issue 1, No.2. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.41605 Corresponding Author: Gary Guerra, PhD Department of Exercise and Sport Science, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, Texas, USA.E-Mail: gguerra5@stmarytx.eduORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-4616
估算下肢假体使用者体脂率的体成分方法比较
背景:在评估下肢截肢患者身体成分时,空气置换容积脉搏波(ADP)与双能x线吸收仪(DXA)的准确性方面缺乏文献评价。必须确定ADP对下肢截肢者的有效性。目的:本研究的目的是使用BOD POD®和DXA比较下肢截肢患者的身体组成。方法:采用ADP和DXA分别对11例下肢义肢使用者(年龄53.2±14.3岁,体重81.9±22.3kg)进行体成分分析。结果:重复测量方差分析显示试验之间和试验之间的体成分无显著差异,F(3,8)= 3.36, p= 0.075。体脂(BF)百分比在BOD POD上(分别为28.5±15.7%和33.7±12.1%)和DXA上(分别为32.9±10.6%和32.0±9.9%)无显著差异。与佩戴义肢相比,未佩戴义肢时BOD POD和DXA之间的相关性最大。Bland-Altman图显示,佩戴假体时,BOD POD®和DXA之间的一致性最大。结论:本研究首次比较了BOD POD®和DXA在下肢假体使用者体内的总脂肪百分比。BOD POD®报告BF%的有效指标。未来的工作将利用BOD POD®在干预研究中监测整个康复过程中身体成分的变化。身体成分的测量有助于了解假肢使用者的健康状况。身体成分评估的金标准方法是通过双能x射线吸收测定法(DXA)。这种方法可能成本很高,而且比空气置换容积脉搏波(ADP)更经济。本研究的目的是探讨使用BOD POD®仪器在下肢假体佩戴者中ADP的准确性。使用BOD POD®和DXA进行体成分测量。在佩戴和不佩戴假体时进行评估。结果表明,两种体成分评估方法在使用和不使用假体时没有差异。成本较低的ADP技术可用于下肢假体使用者的身体组成。文章PDF链接:https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/41605/32165如何引用:Smith JD, Guerra G, Symons TB, Kwon EH, Yoon EJ。估算下肢假体使用者体脂率的体成分方法比较。加拿大假肢Orthotics Journal. 2023;第6卷第1期第2期https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v6i1.41605通讯作者:Gary Guerra,博士,美国德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市圣玛丽大学运动与运动科学系。电子邮件:gguerra5@stmarytx.eduORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0161-4616
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Prosthetics  Orthotics Journal
Canadian Prosthetics Orthotics Journal Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信