The Perpetrator's Allegory: Historical Memories and the Killings of 1965

Q4 Computer Science
Kar-Yen Leong
{"title":"The Perpetrator's Allegory: Historical Memories and the Killings of 1965","authors":"Kar-Yen Leong","doi":"10.1353/ind.2023.a910149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Joshua Oppenheimer's diptych on the legacy of the 1965 anti-communist killings in Indonesia provides scholars and researchers with insights into the lives of the victims and the so-called perpetrators. Several publications and academic volumes have sprung forth from this but remain still ham-strung as that their analysis remains tied to that of Oppenheimer's production. I propose to build on these discussions by asking: how do these perpetrators remember the killings of 1965? From a preliminary analysis of data available, I posit that there is a certain level of 'ambivalence' over the roles they have played in the killings. As such, I posit that these supposedly 'evil-doers' suffer from a form of trauma and therefore complicates our categories of perpetrator, victim and bystander. In my paper, I also state that we can also glean from investigating perpetrator narratives, Indonesia's troubled path in dealing with a violent past. This paper will rely on oral interviews as well as media clippings from various sources in Indonesian. Perpetrators of the 1965 killings in Indonesia violated fundamental religious and social norms. In this article I explore their memories of those events, as revealed in their narratives and oral statements many years later.","PeriodicalId":41794,"journal":{"name":"Internetworking Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internetworking Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ind.2023.a910149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Joshua Oppenheimer's diptych on the legacy of the 1965 anti-communist killings in Indonesia provides scholars and researchers with insights into the lives of the victims and the so-called perpetrators. Several publications and academic volumes have sprung forth from this but remain still ham-strung as that their analysis remains tied to that of Oppenheimer's production. I propose to build on these discussions by asking: how do these perpetrators remember the killings of 1965? From a preliminary analysis of data available, I posit that there is a certain level of 'ambivalence' over the roles they have played in the killings. As such, I posit that these supposedly 'evil-doers' suffer from a form of trauma and therefore complicates our categories of perpetrator, victim and bystander. In my paper, I also state that we can also glean from investigating perpetrator narratives, Indonesia's troubled path in dealing with a violent past. This paper will rely on oral interviews as well as media clippings from various sources in Indonesian. Perpetrators of the 1965 killings in Indonesia violated fundamental religious and social norms. In this article I explore their memories of those events, as revealed in their narratives and oral statements many years later.
犯罪者的寓言:历史记忆与1965年的杀戮
摘要:约书亚·奥本海默(Joshua Oppenheimer)关于1965年印度尼西亚反共屠杀遗留问题的双联画为学者和研究人员提供了了解受害者和所谓肇事者生活的视角。一些出版物和学术书籍由此而生,但仍然是笨拙的,因为他们的分析仍然与奥本海默的作品联系在一起。我建议在这些讨论的基础上提出这样一个问题:这些肇事者如何记住1965年的杀戮?根据对现有数据的初步分析,我认为,对于他们在杀戮中所扮演的角色,人们存在一定程度的“矛盾心理”。因此,我认为这些所谓的“恶人”遭受了某种形式的创伤,因此使我们对肇事者、受害者和旁观者的分类变得复杂。在我的论文中,我还指出,我们还可以从调查肇事者的叙述中收集到印尼在处理暴力过去方面的艰难道路。这篇论文将依赖于口头采访以及来自印度尼西亚各种来源的媒体剪报。1965年印度尼西亚大屠杀的肇事者违反了基本的宗教和社会规范。在这篇文章中,我探索了他们对这些事件的记忆,这些记忆在他们多年后的叙述和口头陈述中显露出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internetworking Indonesia
Internetworking Indonesia COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信