Adam Smith's reversionary annuity: money's worth, default options and auto-enrollment

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Moshe A. Milevsky
{"title":"Adam Smith's reversionary annuity: money's worth, default options and auto-enrollment","authors":"Moshe A. Milevsky","doi":"10.1017/s0968565023000070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Adam Smith – author of Wealth of Nations (1776) and Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) – was elected a professor at the University of Glasgow in 1751, he also joined an annuity ‘scheme’ that was unique for its time. The Scottish Ministers’ Widows’ Fund, as it was known, offered members of the Presbyterian Church as well as the university a choice of levels at which to contribute investment savings, ranging from 2 to 10 percent of their wages. The life-contingent benefits were in the form of a reversionary annuity to a spouse and/or lump sum death benefit to children. This article (i) describes the scheme in financial and actuarial terms, (ii) values Smith's reversionary annuity and (iii) examines the choices made by individual participants. The specific research contribution is to compile the archival data to measure the extent of insurance anti-selection and to demonstrate that debates around choice architecture, default options and auto-enrollment, which infuse the literature in the twenty-first century, were prevalent in the mid eighteenth. For the record, Adam Smith actively contributed at the highest allowed rate, but it wasn't a ‘good’ investment for him, either ex ante or ex post . As for why, one must read the article.","PeriodicalId":44063,"journal":{"name":"Financial History Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565023000070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When Adam Smith – author of Wealth of Nations (1776) and Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) – was elected a professor at the University of Glasgow in 1751, he also joined an annuity ‘scheme’ that was unique for its time. The Scottish Ministers’ Widows’ Fund, as it was known, offered members of the Presbyterian Church as well as the university a choice of levels at which to contribute investment savings, ranging from 2 to 10 percent of their wages. The life-contingent benefits were in the form of a reversionary annuity to a spouse and/or lump sum death benefit to children. This article (i) describes the scheme in financial and actuarial terms, (ii) values Smith's reversionary annuity and (iii) examines the choices made by individual participants. The specific research contribution is to compile the archival data to measure the extent of insurance anti-selection and to demonstrate that debates around choice architecture, default options and auto-enrollment, which infuse the literature in the twenty-first century, were prevalent in the mid eighteenth. For the record, Adam Smith actively contributed at the highest allowed rate, but it wasn't a ‘good’ investment for him, either ex ante or ex post . As for why, one must read the article.
亚当·斯密的回归年金:物有所值,默认选项和自动登记
当《国富论》(1776)和《道德情操论》(1759)的作者亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)在1751年当选格拉斯哥大学(University of Glasgow)教授时,他还加入了当时独一无二的年金“计划”。众所周知,苏格兰部长寡妇基金为长老会教会和大学的成员提供了投资储蓄的选择水平,从工资的2%到10%不等。终身或有津贴的形式是发给配偶的退休年金和/或发给子女的一次性死亡津贴。本文(i)从财务和精算的角度描述了该计划,(ii)对Smith的回归年金进行了估值,(iii)检查了个人参与者所做的选择。具体的研究贡献是汇编档案数据来衡量保险反选择的程度,并证明围绕选择架构,默认选项和自动登记的争论,这些在21世纪的文献中注入了,在18世纪中期很流行。值得一提的是,亚当•斯密(Adam Smith)以允许的最高利率积极地进行了投资,但对他来说,无论是事前还是事后,这都不是一项“好的”投资。至于为什么,你必须阅读这篇文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Financial History Review
Financial History Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Financial History Review is the international forum for all scholars with interests in the development of banking, finance, and monetary matters. Its editors deliberately seek to embrace the broadest approach to publishing research findings within this growing historical specialism. Articles address all aspects of financial and monetary history, including technical and theoretical approaches, those derived from cultural and social perspectives and the interrelations between politics and finance. These presentations of current research are complemented by somewhat shorter pieces, specifically conceived as aids to research. Each issue contains a substantial review section, and every complete volume contains an annual bibliography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信