Deglobalization: a systematic enquiry using 5 Ws and 1 H framework

IF 4.5 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Shamita Garg, Sushil Sushil
{"title":"Deglobalization: a systematic enquiry using 5 Ws and 1 H framework","authors":"Shamita Garg, Sushil Sushil","doi":"10.1108/bij-06-2023-0374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The world is on the verge of entering the deglobalization age, and industrialized economies have ushered it in. However, there is still a scarcity of comprehensive and rigorous studies in this field. This research has tried to analyze the evolution and characteristics of deglobalization research. Design/methodology/approach The authors have employed bibliometric analysis for examining the existing evidence on accelerating deglobalization thinking based on a thorough analysis of articles published during a roughly 25-year span between 1996 and 2022. This study has used the TISM-P technique to study the relationship among the factors accelerating deglobalization thinking. This research reviews the articles on several dimensions of deglobalization using the “what”, “why”, “how”, “who”, “when” and “where” approaches. Findings The authors specify the critical factors, policy reforms, approaches and observed characteristics explored in this developing research area. Practical implications The authors have analyzed the factors accountable for rising deglobalization thinking and also suggested strategic recommendations based on the findings to minimize the adverse impact of globalization. Originality/value Although there is a wealth of literature on globalization, very little study has been done in the field of deglobalization. This is the first substantive review being done in the deglobalization domain. The contemporary research has used the bibliometric approach and the “5W and 1 H” framework to gain a comprehensive understanding of the changing paradigm.","PeriodicalId":48029,"journal":{"name":"Benchmarking-An International Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benchmarking-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2023-0374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The world is on the verge of entering the deglobalization age, and industrialized economies have ushered it in. However, there is still a scarcity of comprehensive and rigorous studies in this field. This research has tried to analyze the evolution and characteristics of deglobalization research. Design/methodology/approach The authors have employed bibliometric analysis for examining the existing evidence on accelerating deglobalization thinking based on a thorough analysis of articles published during a roughly 25-year span between 1996 and 2022. This study has used the TISM-P technique to study the relationship among the factors accelerating deglobalization thinking. This research reviews the articles on several dimensions of deglobalization using the “what”, “why”, “how”, “who”, “when” and “where” approaches. Findings The authors specify the critical factors, policy reforms, approaches and observed characteristics explored in this developing research area. Practical implications The authors have analyzed the factors accountable for rising deglobalization thinking and also suggested strategic recommendations based on the findings to minimize the adverse impact of globalization. Originality/value Although there is a wealth of literature on globalization, very little study has been done in the field of deglobalization. This is the first substantive review being done in the deglobalization domain. The contemporary research has used the bibliometric approach and the “5W and 1 H” framework to gain a comprehensive understanding of the changing paradigm.
去全球化:使用5个w和1个H框架的系统研究
世界正处于进入去全球化时代的边缘,工业化经济引领了这个时代。然而,在这一领域还缺乏全面严谨的研究。本研究试图分析去全球化研究的演变及其特点。设计/方法/方法作者采用文献计量学分析来检验加速去全球化思维的现有证据,该分析基于对1996年至2022年大约25年间发表的文章的全面分析。本研究采用TISM-P技术研究了加速去全球化思维的因素之间的关系。本研究使用“什么”、“为什么”、“如何”、“谁”、“何时”和“何地”的方法回顾了有关去全球化几个维度的文章。作者详细阐述了这一发展中的研究领域所探索的关键因素、政策改革、途径和观察到的特征。作者分析了反全球化思想兴起的因素,并根据研究结果提出了战略建议,以尽量减少全球化的不利影响。虽然关于全球化的文献非常丰富,但在去全球化领域的研究却很少。这是在去全球化领域进行的第一次实质性审查。当代研究使用文献计量学方法和“5W和1 H”框架来全面了解变化的范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Benchmarking is big news for companies committed to total quality programmes. Its enthusiastic reception by many prominent business figures has created high levels of interest in a technique which promises big rewards for co-operating partners. Yet, like total quality itself, it must be understood in its proper context, and implemented single mindedly if it is to be effective - this journal helps companies to decide if benchmarking is right for them, and shows them how to go about it successfully.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信