Psychometric testing of the indonesian version of beck depression inventory-ii among Indonesian floods survivors

Q3 Nursing
Tutu April Ariani, Anastasia Anna, Henik Tri Rahayu, Nur Aini, Heni Dwi Windarwati, Taty Hernawaty, Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Mei-Feng Lin
{"title":"Psychometric testing of the indonesian version of beck depression inventory-ii among Indonesian floods survivors","authors":"Tutu April Ariani, Anastasia Anna, Henik Tri Rahayu, Nur Aini, Heni Dwi Windarwati, Taty Hernawaty, Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage, Mei-Feng Lin","doi":"10.20473/jn.v18i3.47313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Indonesia is a multi-linguistic country using the official language of Bahasa Indonesia. It is important to use formal language to collect research data without misinterpretation of study outcome and intervention effect with high accuracy. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) instrument translated into the Indonesian version was reliable and valid for measuring depression in floods-affected communities. Methods: The forward-backward translation was used to translate the BDI-II from English to Indonesian version. We tested the reliability and validity including content and construct validity through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We recruited 107 annual flood survivors in West Java, Indonesia as participants to test the psychometric testing. Results: The structures shown by the EFA are two factors, with Factor 1 representing negative cognitive-attitude domains and somatic symptom items consisting of Factor 2. The CFA concludes that the general factor model best fits the data on the basis Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI)= 0.8; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)= 0.09; Standard Root-Mean-Square Residual (SRMSR)); Comparative Fit Index (CFI)= 0.81; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI)= 0.79; and p-value χ2 = < 0.01, χ2/df: 1.82). Conclusions: The results showed that the BDI-II Indonesian version has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure depression status among people who suffer floods in community setting. Future studies need to be validated within multiple socio-cultural groups.","PeriodicalId":17781,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ners","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jn.v18i3.47313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Indonesia is a multi-linguistic country using the official language of Bahasa Indonesia. It is important to use formal language to collect research data without misinterpretation of study outcome and intervention effect with high accuracy. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) instrument translated into the Indonesian version was reliable and valid for measuring depression in floods-affected communities. Methods: The forward-backward translation was used to translate the BDI-II from English to Indonesian version. We tested the reliability and validity including content and construct validity through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with varimax rotation and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We recruited 107 annual flood survivors in West Java, Indonesia as participants to test the psychometric testing. Results: The structures shown by the EFA are two factors, with Factor 1 representing negative cognitive-attitude domains and somatic symptom items consisting of Factor 2. The CFA concludes that the general factor model best fits the data on the basis Goodness-of-Fit Index (GFI)= 0.8; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)= 0.09; Standard Root-Mean-Square Residual (SRMSR)); Comparative Fit Index (CFI)= 0.81; Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI)= 0.79; and p-value χ2 = < 0.01, χ2/df: 1.82). Conclusions: The results showed that the BDI-II Indonesian version has good reliability and validity and can be used to measure depression status among people who suffer floods in community setting. Future studies need to be validated within multiple socio-cultural groups.
印尼版贝克抑郁量表-ii在印尼洪水幸存者中的心理测试
印度尼西亚是一个多语言国家,官方语言为印尼语。重要的是使用正式的语言来收集研究数据,而不会误读研究结果和干预效果,并且准确性高。因此,本研究旨在分析翻译成印尼语版本的贝克抑郁量表ii (BDI-II)是否可靠和有效地用于测量受洪水影响社区的抑郁。方法:采用正反译法将BDI-II从英文翻译成印尼语。我们通过变量旋转探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来检验信度和效度,包括内容和结构效度。我们在印度尼西亚西爪哇招募了107名年度洪水幸存者作为参与者进行心理测试。结果:EFA显示的结构是两个因子,因子1代表负性认知态度域,因子2组成躯体症状项。结果表明,当拟合优度指数(GFI)= 0.8时,一般因子模型最能拟合数据;均方根近似误差(RMSEA)= 0.09;标准均方根残差(SRMSR);比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.81;Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)= 0.79;p值χ2 = <0.01, χ2/df: 1.82)。结论:印尼版BDI-II具有良好的信度和效度,可用于社区环境中洪水灾民的抑郁状况测评。未来的研究需要在多个社会文化群体中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信