Existence of Constitutional Court Ruling I Strengthening Legal Civilization and Indonesian Democracy

IF 0.3
None Abustan
{"title":"Existence of Constitutional Court Ruling I Strengthening Legal Civilization and Indonesian Democracy","authors":"None Abustan","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study This For now The Existence of Constitutional Court Decisions i Strengthens Legal Civilization And Indonesian Democracy .
 
 Theoretical framework: Civil law focuses more on administration and norm systems, while common law focuses more on judicial activities. Even more than that, the concept of rechtsstaat prioritizes the principle of wetmatigheid (written law), which later developed into rechtmatigheid (action based on law).
 
 Method: There is method study Qualitative with type study studies library . Data taken can form journal scientific , books , articles , and source information other relevant ones with topic research . In method elitism _ studies librarian , researcher usually carry out the search process And data collection via various source information .
 
 Results: The results of this research are that the position of the constitution in a country is inseparable from the ideal image of the characteristics of a legal and democratic state; After the reform, the Constitutional Court appeared as part of judicial power. The authority of this institution is to adjudicate at the first and final level whose decisions are final and binding. The upholding of a constitution in a country strengthens legal civilization and democracy itself.
 
 Conclusion: The constitutional court and all citizens must continue to make efforts to bring constitutional ideas closer to each other and fill the pulse of national and state life.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study This For now The Existence of Constitutional Court Decisions i Strengthens Legal Civilization And Indonesian Democracy . Theoretical framework: Civil law focuses more on administration and norm systems, while common law focuses more on judicial activities. Even more than that, the concept of rechtsstaat prioritizes the principle of wetmatigheid (written law), which later developed into rechtmatigheid (action based on law). Method: There is method study Qualitative with type study studies library . Data taken can form journal scientific , books , articles , and source information other relevant ones with topic research . In method elitism _ studies librarian , researcher usually carry out the search process And data collection via various source information . Results: The results of this research are that the position of the constitution in a country is inseparable from the ideal image of the characteristics of a legal and democratic state; After the reform, the Constitutional Court appeared as part of judicial power. The authority of this institution is to adjudicate at the first and final level whose decisions are final and binding. The upholding of a constitution in a country strengthens legal civilization and democracy itself. Conclusion: The constitutional court and all citizens must continue to make efforts to bring constitutional ideas closer to each other and fill the pulse of national and state life.
宪法法院判决的存在——强化法律文明与印尼民主
目的:本研究的目的:目前宪法法院判决的存在加强了法律文明和印尼民主。 & # x0D;理论框架:大陆法系侧重于行政和规范制度,英美法系侧重于司法活动。不仅如此,rechtsstaat的概念优先于成文法律(成文法律)原则,该原则后来发展为基于法律的行动(基于法律的行动)。& # x0D;方法:有方法研究定性和类型研究图书馆。采集的数据可以形成期刊、书籍、文章和其他与主题研究相关的源信息。在精英主义研究图书馆员的方法中,研究人员通常通过各种来源的信息进行搜索和数据收集。 & # x0D;结果:本文的研究结果是:宪法在一个国家中的地位离不开法治民主国家特征的理想形象;改革后,宪法裁判所作为司法权的一部分出现。该机构的权威是在第一和最后一级进行裁决,其决定是最终的和有约束力的。一个国家的宪法的维护加强了法律文明和民主本身。 & # x0D;结束语:宪法法院和全体公民必须继续努力,使宪法思想更接近彼此,填补民族和国家生活的脉搏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信