Electronic Proves as One of the Modern Independent Means of Evidence

IF 0.3
Beibit Birzhanov, Assemgul Sakenova, Erkin Abeuov, Kairat Birzhanov, Assel Sopyhanova, Gulmira Talapova
{"title":"Electronic Proves as One of the Modern Independent Means of Evidence","authors":"Beibit Birzhanov, Assemgul Sakenova, Erkin Abeuov, Kairat Birzhanov, Assel Sopyhanova, Gulmira Talapova","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: the purpose of this study is a determination of the procedural status of electronic documents as electronic evidence and identification of gaps in legislation regarding their legal regulation.
 
 Theoretical framework: theoretical materials were based on international scientific publications, reports, and scientific papers. And also for a more complete and objective presentation of the problem being studied, also practical materials from criminal cases were used.
 
 Method: is a dialectical method of understanding general patterns and particular manifestations of the essence of phenomena of objective reality. The comparative legal method made it possible to qualitatively study foreign legislation from the point of view of the legal regulation of electronic evidence and their application in practice. The method of mathematical analysis and logic made it possible to analyze everything that could relate to electronic evidence, identifying their characteristics.
 
 Results and conclusion: electronic evidence is information in electronic digital form, suitable for communication, interpretation or processing. In the electronic digital environment, the main interacting objects are various kinds of information objects (data sets, files, programs, etc.) with a complex hierarchical structure. Data in electronic digital form are intended to transmit information through media, information systems and telecommunication networks, and in the event of a crime being committed against them, their protection is of primary interest, and the nature and content of this data fades into the background.
 
 Originality/value: the value of the study lies in the fact that, based on a comprehensive analysis, electronic evidence has a unique structure and ensuring their safety is one of the criteria for their use, as well as the possibility of introducing a copying function will expand the process of processing evidence. The concept of “computer information” is the author’s definition, which will allow us to consolidate electronic evidence as an independent type.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"49 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: the purpose of this study is a determination of the procedural status of electronic documents as electronic evidence and identification of gaps in legislation regarding their legal regulation. Theoretical framework: theoretical materials were based on international scientific publications, reports, and scientific papers. And also for a more complete and objective presentation of the problem being studied, also practical materials from criminal cases were used. Method: is a dialectical method of understanding general patterns and particular manifestations of the essence of phenomena of objective reality. The comparative legal method made it possible to qualitatively study foreign legislation from the point of view of the legal regulation of electronic evidence and their application in practice. The method of mathematical analysis and logic made it possible to analyze everything that could relate to electronic evidence, identifying their characteristics. Results and conclusion: electronic evidence is information in electronic digital form, suitable for communication, interpretation or processing. In the electronic digital environment, the main interacting objects are various kinds of information objects (data sets, files, programs, etc.) with a complex hierarchical structure. Data in electronic digital form are intended to transmit information through media, information systems and telecommunication networks, and in the event of a crime being committed against them, their protection is of primary interest, and the nature and content of this data fades into the background. Originality/value: the value of the study lies in the fact that, based on a comprehensive analysis, electronic evidence has a unique structure and ensuring their safety is one of the criteria for their use, as well as the possibility of introducing a copying function will expand the process of processing evidence. The concept of “computer information” is the author’s definition, which will allow us to consolidate electronic evidence as an independent type.
电子证明作为现代独立的证据手段之一
目的:本研究的目的是确定电子文件作为电子证据的程序地位,并确定其法律规制方面的立法空白。 & # x0D;理论框架:理论材料以国际科学出版物、报告和科学论文为基础。为了更完整、客观地呈现所研究的问题,我们还使用了刑事案件中的实际材料。& # x0D;方法:是认识客观现实现象本质的一般规律和特殊表现的辩证方法。比较法可以从电子证据的法律规制及其在实践中的应用的角度对国外立法进行定性研究。数学分析和逻辑的方法使分析与电子证据有关的一切成为可能,并确定其特征。 & # x0D;结果与结论:电子证据是电子数字形式的信息,适用于交流、解释或处理。在电子数字环境中,主要的交互对象是具有复杂层次结构的各类信息对象(数据集、文件、程序等)。电子数字形式的数据旨在通过媒体、信息系统和电信网络传输信息,在对这些数据实施犯罪的情况下,保护这些数据是首要利益,而这些数据的性质和内容则退隐到背景中。 & # x0D;原创性/价值:研究的价值在于,综合分析,电子证据具有独特的结构,确保其安全性是其使用的标准之一,并且引入复制功能的可能性将扩大处理证据的过程。作者对“计算机信息”的概念进行了界定,这将使我们能够将电子证据作为一种独立的类型加以巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信