Towards a Citizen- and Citizenry-Centric Digitalization of the Urban Environment: Urban Digital Twinning as Commoning

Stefano Calzati, Bastiaan van Loenen
{"title":"Towards a Citizen- and Citizenry-Centric Digitalization of the Urban Environment: Urban Digital Twinning as Commoning","authors":"Stefano Calzati, Bastiaan van Loenen","doi":"10.1007/s44206-023-00064-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper, we make a case for (1) a sociotechnical understanding and (2) a commoning approach to the governance of digital twin technologies applied to the urban environment. The European Union has reinstated many times over the willingness to pursue a citizen-centric approach to digital transformation. However, recent studies show the limits of a human right-based only approach in that this overlooks consequences of data-driven technologies at societal level. The need to synthesize an individual-based and collective-based approach within an ecosystemic vision is key, especially when it comes to cities, which are complex systems affected by problems whose solutions require forms of self-organization. Tackling the limitations of current tech-centered and practice-first city digital twin (CDT) projects in Europe, in this article, we conceptualize the idea of urban digital twinning (UDT) as a process that is contextual, iterative, and participatory. Unpacking the normative understanding of data-as-resource, we claim that a commoning approach to data allows enacting a fair ecosystemic vision of the digitalization of the urban environment which is ultimately both citizen- and citizenry-centric.","PeriodicalId":72819,"journal":{"name":"Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital society : ethics, socio-legal and governance of digital technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00064-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we make a case for (1) a sociotechnical understanding and (2) a commoning approach to the governance of digital twin technologies applied to the urban environment. The European Union has reinstated many times over the willingness to pursue a citizen-centric approach to digital transformation. However, recent studies show the limits of a human right-based only approach in that this overlooks consequences of data-driven technologies at societal level. The need to synthesize an individual-based and collective-based approach within an ecosystemic vision is key, especially when it comes to cities, which are complex systems affected by problems whose solutions require forms of self-organization. Tackling the limitations of current tech-centered and practice-first city digital twin (CDT) projects in Europe, in this article, we conceptualize the idea of urban digital twinning (UDT) as a process that is contextual, iterative, and participatory. Unpacking the normative understanding of data-as-resource, we claim that a commoning approach to data allows enacting a fair ecosystemic vision of the digitalization of the urban environment which is ultimately both citizen- and citizenry-centric.
走向以市民和市民为中心的城市环境数字化:城市数字孪生的共性
在本文中,我们提出了(1)社会技术理解和(2)应用于城市环境的数字孪生技术治理的共同方法。欧盟已经多次表示愿意采取以公民为中心的数字化转型方法。然而,最近的研究表明,只以人权为基础的做法存在局限性,因为它忽视了数据驱动技术在社会层面的后果。在生态系统的视野中,综合个人和集体的方法是关键,特别是当涉及到城市时,城市是受问题影响的复杂系统,其解决方案需要各种形式的自组织。为了解决当前欧洲以技术为中心和实践为先的城市数字孪生(CDT)项目的局限性,本文将城市数字孪生(UDT)概念化为一个上下文相关、迭代和参与性的过程。通过对数据即资源的规范理解,我们提出了一种通用的数据处理方法,可以为城市环境的数字化制定一个公平的生态系统愿景,最终以公民和公民为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信