On the Robustness of Topics API to a Re-Identification Attack

Nikhil Jha, Martino Trevisan, Emilio Leonardi, Marco Mellia
{"title":"On the Robustness of Topics API to a Re-Identification Attack","authors":"Nikhil Jha, Martino Trevisan, Emilio Leonardi, Marco Mellia","doi":"10.56553/popets-2023-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Web tracking through third-party cookies is considered a threat to users' privacy and is supposed to be abandoned in the near future. Recently, Google proposed the Topics API framework as a privacy-friendly alternative for behavioural advertising. Using this approach, the browser builds a user profile based on navigation history, which advertisers can access. The Topics API has the possibility of becoming the new standard for behavioural advertising, thus it is necessary to fully understand its operation and find possible limitations. This paper evaluates the robustness of the Topics API to a re-identification attack where an attacker reconstructs the user profile by accumulating user's exposed topics over time to later re-identify the same user on a different website. Using real traffic traces and realistic population models, we find that the Topics API mitigates but cannot prevent re-identification to take place, as there is a sizeable chance that a user's profile is unique within a website's audience. Consequently, the probability of correct re-identification can reach 15-17%, considering a pool of 1,000 users. We offer the code and data we use in this work to stimulate further studies and the tuning of the Topic API parameters.","PeriodicalId":74556,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2023-0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Web tracking through third-party cookies is considered a threat to users' privacy and is supposed to be abandoned in the near future. Recently, Google proposed the Topics API framework as a privacy-friendly alternative for behavioural advertising. Using this approach, the browser builds a user profile based on navigation history, which advertisers can access. The Topics API has the possibility of becoming the new standard for behavioural advertising, thus it is necessary to fully understand its operation and find possible limitations. This paper evaluates the robustness of the Topics API to a re-identification attack where an attacker reconstructs the user profile by accumulating user's exposed topics over time to later re-identify the same user on a different website. Using real traffic traces and realistic population models, we find that the Topics API mitigates but cannot prevent re-identification to take place, as there is a sizeable chance that a user's profile is unique within a website's audience. Consequently, the probability of correct re-identification can reach 15-17%, considering a pool of 1,000 users. We offer the code and data we use in this work to stimulate further studies and the tuning of the Topic API parameters.
主题API对重新识别攻击的鲁棒性研究
通过第三方cookie进行网络跟踪被认为是对用户隐私的威胁,应该在不久的将来被放弃。最近,谷歌提出了主题API框架,作为行为广告的隐私友好替代方案。使用这种方法,浏览器根据导航历史建立用户档案,广告商可以访问这些档案。topic API有可能成为行为广告的新标准,因此有必要充分了解其运作并找出可能存在的局限性。本文评估了主题API对重新识别攻击的鲁棒性,攻击者通过积累用户暴露的主题来重建用户配置文件,以便稍后在不同的网站上重新识别同一用户。使用真实的流量跟踪和现实的人口模型,我们发现主题API减轻了但不能阻止重新识别的发生,因为用户的个人资料在网站受众中是唯一的可能性很大。因此,考虑到1,000个用户池,正确重新识别的概率可以达到15-17%。我们提供了在这项工作中使用的代码和数据,以促进进一步的研究和Topic API参数的调优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信