Is JTB Knowledge Hopeless?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Logos and Episteme Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5840/logos-episteme202314321

Arnold Cusmariu

引用次数: 0

Abstract

An argument structure that covers both cases Gettier described in his 1963 paper reinforces the conclusion of my 2012 Logos & Episteme article that the justified true belief (JTB) conception of knowledge is inconsistent. The stronger argument makes possible identification of fundamental flaws in the standard approach of adding a fourth condition to JTB, so that a new kind of skepticism becomes inevitable unless conceptual change occurs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

JTB知识无望吗?

盖提尔在他1963年的论文中描述的论证结构涵盖了这两种情况，强化了我2012年的逻各斯结论;认识论文章认为正当的真信念(JTB)的知识概念是不一致的。更有力的论证使得在为JTB添加第四个条件的标准方法中识别根本缺陷成为可能，因此，除非概念发生变化，否则一种新的怀疑将不可避免。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logos and Episteme Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： the journal publishes articles, reviews or discussion notes focused as well on problems concerning the general theory of knowledge, as on problems specific to the philosophy, methodology and ethics of science, philosophical logic, metaphilosophy, moral epistemology, epistemology of art, epistemology of religion, social or political epistemology, epistemology of communication. Studies in the history of science and of the philosophy of knowledge, or studies in the sociology of knowledge, cognitive psychology, and cognitive science are also welcome.