Diversity Management: Architecture And Perspectives

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS
Massimo Pollifroni, Adrian Ioana, Riccardo Pollifroni
{"title":"Diversity Management: Architecture And Perspectives","authors":"Massimo Pollifroni, Adrian Ioana, Riccardo Pollifroni","doi":"10.2478/sbe-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The initial idealistic perspective associated with the concept of globalization has turned into a bleak evidence in the present, which has taken on the appearance of a disharmonious liberalism in which it is possible to observe a common worldwide increase in economic and social inequalities. The current international economic crises – characterized by a common inflationary growth – have led to a re-evaluation of the principles of the autarkic economy, economically self-sufficient and relatively independent from the external environment: an approach to which economists attribute the term “deglobalization” (Ajami, 2022; Ho et.al, 2022; Paul, 2023). These foregoing points a duty – also in business economics – to review the models proposed over time in search of new hybrid patterns oriented towards a common social vocation, suggested as a dual attention to both internal (facing the aspects regarding the going concern accounting principle) and external (relevant to the economic and social sustainability of its main stakeholders). Therefore, the article assumes as a research question the declination of the new corporate hybrid patterns and the related “competitive advantage” drivers, among which Diversity Management assumes a decisive role in the pursuit of fair and sustainable progress.","PeriodicalId":43310,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Business and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The initial idealistic perspective associated with the concept of globalization has turned into a bleak evidence in the present, which has taken on the appearance of a disharmonious liberalism in which it is possible to observe a common worldwide increase in economic and social inequalities. The current international economic crises – characterized by a common inflationary growth – have led to a re-evaluation of the principles of the autarkic economy, economically self-sufficient and relatively independent from the external environment: an approach to which economists attribute the term “deglobalization” (Ajami, 2022; Ho et.al, 2022; Paul, 2023). These foregoing points a duty – also in business economics – to review the models proposed over time in search of new hybrid patterns oriented towards a common social vocation, suggested as a dual attention to both internal (facing the aspects regarding the going concern accounting principle) and external (relevant to the economic and social sustainability of its main stakeholders). Therefore, the article assumes as a research question the declination of the new corporate hybrid patterns and the related “competitive advantage” drivers, among which Diversity Management assumes a decisive role in the pursuit of fair and sustainable progress.
多样性管理:架构和视角
与全球化概念相关的最初的理想主义观点在当前已经变成了一种黯淡的证据,它呈现出一种不和谐的自由主义的外观,在这种自由主义中可以观察到世界范围内经济和社会不平等的共同增加。当前的国际经济危机- -其特点是普遍的通货膨胀增长- -导致了对自给自足经济原则的重新评价,即经济上自给自足和相对独立于外部环境:经济学家将这种方法称为“去全球化”(Ajami, 2022;Ho et al ., 2022;保罗,2023)。上述观点是一种责任-也是在商业经济学中-审查随着时间的推移提出的模型,以寻找面向共同社会职业的新的混合模式,建议双重关注内部(面对有关持续经营会计原则的方面)和外部(与主要利益相关者的经济和社会可持续性相关)。因此,本文将新的企业混合模式的衰落及其相关的“竞争优势”驱动因素作为研究问题,其中多样性管理在追求公平和可持续发展方面起着决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信