Prospects for the Use of Monofocal IOLs with Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Instead of Traditional Multifocal (Trifocal) IOLs in Cataract Surgery

Q4 Medicine
M. E. Konovalov, A. V. Morenko
{"title":"Prospects for the Use of Monofocal IOLs with Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Instead of Traditional Multifocal (Trifocal) IOLs in Cataract Surgery","authors":"M. E. Konovalov, A. V. Morenko","doi":"10.18008/1816-5095-2023-3-460-464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose — a literature review of comparative studies of the clinical efficacy of IOLs based on extended depth of focus technology (EDOF) and trifocal IOLs (TFIOLs). Methods . Literature analysis was performed in the international database “PubMed”.The search keywords were “IOL with extended depth of focus (EDOF)”, “Trifocal IOL”, “Contrast sensitivity”, “Aberrometry”, “Defocus curve”. The choice of sources for the review was carried out in accordance with the criteria for prospective or retrospective studies. A total of 158 sources were analyzed, further using systematic review filters and the authors’ knowledge of the topic. The duration of the retrospective analysis was 8 years (2015–2022), some of the considered works were dated 2023. Results . The values of visual acuity for distance, near and at an intermediate distance in both studied groups did not differ significantly. When analyzing the defocusing curve, the preservation of visual acuity under load conditions from +1.0 to +3.0 diopters was determined for both types of IOL, respectively. At the same time, visual acuity was significantly better in the TPIOL group than in the EDOF group in the optical load range from -2.5 to -4.0 diopters. Most studies did not report significant difference between EDOF and TFIOL in terms of contrast sensitivity, the likelihood of postoperative “halo” effects, and “independence” of spectacle correction. The stated provisions are fully consistent with the results of the medical and technical evaluation of EDOF presented in the literature. Conclusion . The development of a new type of EDOF IOL seems to be a promising direction in cataract surgery, especially taking into account the possibility of using patients whose professional activities are associated with long-term visual work at intermediate distances (for example, users of personal computers). Further accumulation of clinical material is required in the context of the role and place of EDOF in the general system of aphakia correction, taking into account the IOL model and the conditions of the patient’s professional visual activity.","PeriodicalId":37645,"journal":{"name":"Oftalmologiya","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oftalmologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2023-3-460-464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose — a literature review of comparative studies of the clinical efficacy of IOLs based on extended depth of focus technology (EDOF) and trifocal IOLs (TFIOLs). Methods . Literature analysis was performed in the international database “PubMed”.The search keywords were “IOL with extended depth of focus (EDOF)”, “Trifocal IOL”, “Contrast sensitivity”, “Aberrometry”, “Defocus curve”. The choice of sources for the review was carried out in accordance with the criteria for prospective or retrospective studies. A total of 158 sources were analyzed, further using systematic review filters and the authors’ knowledge of the topic. The duration of the retrospective analysis was 8 years (2015–2022), some of the considered works were dated 2023. Results . The values of visual acuity for distance, near and at an intermediate distance in both studied groups did not differ significantly. When analyzing the defocusing curve, the preservation of visual acuity under load conditions from +1.0 to +3.0 diopters was determined for both types of IOL, respectively. At the same time, visual acuity was significantly better in the TPIOL group than in the EDOF group in the optical load range from -2.5 to -4.0 diopters. Most studies did not report significant difference between EDOF and TFIOL in terms of contrast sensitivity, the likelihood of postoperative “halo” effects, and “independence” of spectacle correction. The stated provisions are fully consistent with the results of the medical and technical evaluation of EDOF presented in the literature. Conclusion . The development of a new type of EDOF IOL seems to be a promising direction in cataract surgery, especially taking into account the possibility of using patients whose professional activities are associated with long-term visual work at intermediate distances (for example, users of personal computers). Further accumulation of clinical material is required in the context of the role and place of EDOF in the general system of aphakia correction, taking into account the IOL model and the conditions of the patient’s professional visual activity.
扩展焦深单焦点人工晶体(EDOF)在白内障手术中替代传统多焦点(三焦)人工晶体的应用前景
目的:对基于扩展聚焦深度技术(EDOF)和三焦人工晶体(TFIOLs)的人工晶体临床疗效的比较研究进行文献综述。方法。在国际数据库“PubMed”中进行文献分析。搜索关键词为“扩展聚焦深度IOL (EDOF)”、“三焦IOL”、“对比敏感度”、“像差测量”、“离焦曲线”。根据前瞻性或回顾性研究的标准选择研究来源。共分析了158个来源,进一步使用系统评价过滤器和作者对主题的了解。回顾性分析的持续时间为8年(2015-2022),其中一些被考虑的作品的日期为2023年。结果。两组在距离、近距离和中距离的视敏度值无显著差异。通过对离焦曲线的分析,确定了两种类型的人工晶状体在+1.0 ~ +3.0屈光度的负载条件下的视力保留。同时,在-2.5 ~ -4.0屈光度范围内,TPIOL组的视力明显优于EDOF组。大多数研究没有报道EDOF和TFIOL在对比敏感度、术后“光晕”效应的可能性和眼镜矫正的“独立性”方面有显著差异。所述规定与文献中提出的EDOF的医学和技术评价结果完全一致。结论。新型EDOF人工晶状体的开发似乎是白内障手术的一个有前途的方向,特别是考虑到在中距离使用专业活动与长期视力工作相关的患者(例如,个人电脑用户)的可能性。考虑到人工晶状体模型和患者的专业视觉活动情况,在无晶状体矫正的一般系统中,EDOF的作用和地位需要进一步积累临床资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oftalmologiya
Oftalmologiya Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The scientific journal Oftalmologiya is included in the Scopus database. Publisher country is RU. The main subject areas of published articles are Ophthalmology, Физиология, Клиническая медицина, Профилактическая медицина, Медико-биологические науки, Фармацевтические науки. Before sending a scientific article, we recommend you to read the section For authors. This will allow you to prepare an article better for publication, to make it more interesting for the readers and useful for the scientific community. By following these steps, you will greatly increase the likelihood of your scientific article publishing in journals included in international citation systems (e.g., Scopus). Then you may choose a different journal, select the journal included to list of SAC Russia journal list, or send your scientific work for review and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信