Risk Factors Contributing to Crossing Professional Boundaries in the Context of COVID-19 in the Czech Republic

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Romana Dimmrothová, Martina Křivánková, Pavel Navrátil, Vanda Hendrychová
{"title":"Risk Factors Contributing to Crossing Professional Boundaries in the Context of COVID-19 in the Czech Republic","authors":"Romana Dimmrothová, Martina Křivánková, Pavel Navrátil, Vanda Hendrychová","doi":"10.1093/bjsw/bcad215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Crossing professional boundaries in the context of Czech social work remains an understudied phenomenon. Additionally, the recent situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected work conditions and transformed social work practice. The aim of this article is to answer the following research question: How do subjectively experienced risk factors affect the social worker in situations when professional boundaries are crossed and in the context of a pandemic situation (COVID-19)? The text is based on the theory of professional boundaries in the client–worker relationship and also includes the perspective of professional boundary crossing in social work. The key conceptual framework is ecosystem theory qualitative research carried out in two phases via in-depth semi-structured interviews in the selected locality. Each phase included informers who were active as social workers in low-threshold centres for children and youth. The text is a reflection of the influence of external factors on professional boundaries and of the internal dispositions of social workers, on the basis of which the text offers practical recommendations for social work practice in three categories: social workers at the individual level, leadership and organisations, educational institutions.","PeriodicalId":48259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Social Work","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Crossing professional boundaries in the context of Czech social work remains an understudied phenomenon. Additionally, the recent situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic dramatically affected work conditions and transformed social work practice. The aim of this article is to answer the following research question: How do subjectively experienced risk factors affect the social worker in situations when professional boundaries are crossed and in the context of a pandemic situation (COVID-19)? The text is based on the theory of professional boundaries in the client–worker relationship and also includes the perspective of professional boundary crossing in social work. The key conceptual framework is ecosystem theory qualitative research carried out in two phases via in-depth semi-structured interviews in the selected locality. Each phase included informers who were active as social workers in low-threshold centres for children and youth. The text is a reflection of the influence of external factors on professional boundaries and of the internal dispositions of social workers, on the basis of which the text offers practical recommendations for social work practice in three categories: social workers at the individual level, leadership and organisations, educational institutions.
捷克共和国2019冠状病毒病背景下跨越职业界限的风险因素
在捷克社会工作背景下,跨越专业界限仍然是一个未被充分研究的现象。此外,最近由COVID-19大流行引起的局势极大地影响了工作条件,改变了社会工作实践。本文的目的是回答以下研究问题:在跨越专业界限和大流行情况(COVID-19)的情况下,主观经历的风险因素如何影响社会工作者?本文以客工关系中的专业边界理论为基础,同时也包含了社会工作中专业边界跨越的视角。关键的概念框架是生态系统理论定性研究,通过在选定的地方进行深入的半结构化访谈,分两个阶段进行。每个阶段都包括在低门槛儿童和青年中心作为社会工作者活跃的告密者。该文本反映了外部因素对专业界限的影响以及社会工作者的内部倾向,在此基础上,该文本为社会工作实践提供了三类实用建议:个人层面的社会工作者、领导和组织、教育机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
22.20%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Published for the British Association of Social Workers, this is the leading academic social work journal in the UK. It covers every aspect of social work, with papers reporting research, discussing practice, and examining principles and theories. It is read by social work educators, researchers, practitioners and managers who wish to keep up to date with theoretical and empirical developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信