Immoral, infectious, or both? How disgust sensitivity predicts judgments of violations against COVID‐19 mitigation actions

IF 4.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Sascha Schwarz, Lisa Klümper, Markus Thomas Jansen, Maria Agthe
{"title":"Immoral, infectious, or both? How disgust sensitivity predicts judgments of violations against COVID‐19 mitigation actions","authors":"Sascha Schwarz, Lisa Klümper, Markus Thomas Jansen, Maria Agthe","doi":"10.1111/spc3.12914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Violations against mitigation actions to prevent the spreading of the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus causing COVID‐19, such as not wearing a mask or not practicing social distancing, were seen as immoral and could also increase the likelihood of spreading the virus. In two studies ( N 1 = 318, N 2 = 293), we found that moral and pathogen disgust sensitivity differentially predicted perceptions of such COVID‐19 violations against mitigation actions, framed as a moral, pathogen, or on a good‐bad dimension, albeit in a less specific way than initially hypothesized (e.g., regarding the pathogenic framed violations, not only pathogen but also moral disgust was associated with higher perceptions of infectiousness). These results suggest that individual differences, especially in pathogen disgust (and, more inconsistently, moral disgust), are important when evaluating violations against mitigation actions. Further research on the role of moral disgust is needed.","PeriodicalId":53583,"journal":{"name":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","volume":"15 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Personality Psychology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12914","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Violations against mitigation actions to prevent the spreading of the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus causing COVID‐19, such as not wearing a mask or not practicing social distancing, were seen as immoral and could also increase the likelihood of spreading the virus. In two studies ( N 1 = 318, N 2 = 293), we found that moral and pathogen disgust sensitivity differentially predicted perceptions of such COVID‐19 violations against mitigation actions, framed as a moral, pathogen, or on a good‐bad dimension, albeit in a less specific way than initially hypothesized (e.g., regarding the pathogenic framed violations, not only pathogen but also moral disgust was associated with higher perceptions of infectiousness). These results suggest that individual differences, especially in pathogen disgust (and, more inconsistently, moral disgust), are important when evaluating violations against mitigation actions. Further research on the role of moral disgust is needed.
不道德,有传染性,还是两者兼而有之?厌恶敏感性如何预测违反COVID - 19缓解措施的判断
违反缓解措施以防止SARS - CoV - 2病毒引起COVID - 19的传播,例如不戴口罩或不保持社交距离,被视为不道德,也可能增加病毒传播的可能性。在两项研究中(N 1 = 318, N 2 = 293),我们发现道德和病原体厌恶敏感性差异预测了对此类COVID - 19违反缓解行动的看法,框架为道德,病原体或好-坏维度,尽管以比最初假设的更不具体的方式(例如,关于致病性框架违规,不仅病原体而且道德厌恶与更高的传染性感知相关)。这些结果表明,个体差异,特别是在病原体厌恶(以及更不一致的道德厌恶)方面,在评估违反缓解行动时很重要。道德厌恶的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Social and Personality Psychology Compass Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信