Harmonizing Personal and Professional Boundaries: An Explanatory Qualitative Study of Relationship Tensions from a Critical Realist Perspective

Retchell Rubin L. Morales, Joliber M. Caminong, Manuel R. Tanpoco
{"title":"Harmonizing Personal and Professional Boundaries: An Explanatory Qualitative Study of Relationship Tensions from a Critical Realist Perspective","authors":"Retchell Rubin L. Morales, Joliber M. Caminong, Manuel R. Tanpoco","doi":"10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2023.1(174)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisations attempt to maintain the balance between personal friendships and professional relationships. Proof of this is how organisations assert the importance of team-building activities that it has become a regular in the annual plan of big and small corporations alike. The goals – promote camaraderie and create more friendships in the workplace. Yet, organisations also worry that employees will be too close that work matters will be disrupted, interactions will be less professional, and conflicts of interest will arise. The spectrum of friendships spans from initial acquaintances to close and best friends that weave human interactions (Hojjat & Moyer, 2017; Morales, 2022, Sias & Cahill, 1998). This involves shared respect, genuine regard, and reciprocal exchanges that grow as the bond between individuals strengthens. In the workplace, friendships go beyond social connections, fostering support and a deeper sense of belonging (Dietz & Fasbender, 2022; Morales, 2022). Keywords: workplace friendships, critical realist, tensions, personal friendships, professional relationships","PeriodicalId":143319,"journal":{"name":"Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Conference on Business and Social Sciences Proceeding","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35609/gcbssproceeding.2023.1(174)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organisations attempt to maintain the balance between personal friendships and professional relationships. Proof of this is how organisations assert the importance of team-building activities that it has become a regular in the annual plan of big and small corporations alike. The goals – promote camaraderie and create more friendships in the workplace. Yet, organisations also worry that employees will be too close that work matters will be disrupted, interactions will be less professional, and conflicts of interest will arise. The spectrum of friendships spans from initial acquaintances to close and best friends that weave human interactions (Hojjat & Moyer, 2017; Morales, 2022, Sias & Cahill, 1998). This involves shared respect, genuine regard, and reciprocal exchanges that grow as the bond between individuals strengthens. In the workplace, friendships go beyond social connections, fostering support and a deeper sense of belonging (Dietz & Fasbender, 2022; Morales, 2022). Keywords: workplace friendships, critical realist, tensions, personal friendships, professional relationships
协调个人和职业界限:从批判现实主义视角对关系紧张的解释性定性研究
组织试图在个人友谊和职业关系之间保持平衡。证明这一点的是,组织如何断言团队建设活动的重要性,它已成为大公司和小公司的年度计划中的常规内容。目标是在工作场所促进同志情谊,创造更多的友谊。然而,组织也担心员工过于亲密,工作事务将被打乱,互动将不那么专业,利益冲突将出现。友谊的范围从最初的熟人到亲密和最好的朋友,编织了人类的互动(Hojjat &梅奥,2017;Morales, 2022, Sias &卡希尔,1998)。这包括共同的尊重,真诚的关心,以及随着个人之间联系的加强而增长的互惠交流。在工作场所,友谊超越了社会关系,促进了支持和更深层次的归属感(迪茨和;Fasbender, 2022;莫拉莱斯,2022)。关键词:职场友谊,批判现实主义,紧张,个人友谊,职业关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信