Treatment Strategies Demonstration of the Omnibus Law in a Democratic Policing Perspective

Q4 Social Sciences

Journal of Social Research and Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.55324/josr.v2i12.1582

Fabian Condo Wijaya, Khaerul Ardhian Syaekh, Chairul Muriman S, Riski S. Handayani

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the handling of omnibus law demonstrations using a democratic policing approach. Democratic Policing (Democratic Policing) should be a consequence of the Polri reform agenda, a reformative agenda regarding the posture of the Polri in the political system of the Republic of Indonesia, covering the culture of Polri personnel in the implementation of national security. This research is qualitative. The results of this research explain the efforts that have been made by Polda Metro Jaya in handling the Omnibuslaw demonstration, namely; a) Pre-emptive efforts to provide advice to protesters about good demonstration procedures and inform the relevant agencies that are the target points for demonstrations and/or demonstrations, b) preventive efforts have been carried out by the Police in carrying out their duties by fixed procedures (Protap). This is intended so that the police, both individuals and units, in taking action are not seen as excessive by the public.

查看原文本刊更多论文

民主警务视角下的综合法处理策略论证

本研究旨在分析使用民主警务方法处理综合法律示威。民主警务(民主警务)应该是Polri改革议程的结果，这是一个关于Polri在印度尼西亚共和国政治制度中的姿态的改革议程，包括Polri人员在执行国家安全方面的文化。这项研究是定性的。本研究的结果解释了Polda Metro Jaya在处理Omnibuslaw示范时所做的努力，即;a)先发制人，向示威者提供良好示威程序的建议，并通知示威和/或示威的目标点有关机构;b)警方在执行任务时采取了预防性措施(Protap)。这样做的目的是使警察，无论是个人还是单位，在采取行动时不会被公众视为过度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Social Research and Policy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

8 weeks

期刊介绍： Welfare states have made well-being one of the main focuses of public policies. Social policies entail, however, complicated, and sometimes almost insurmountable, issues of prioritization, measurement, problem evaluation or strategic and technical decision making concerning aim-setting or finding the most adequate means to ends. Given the pressures to effectiveness it is no wonder that the last several decades have witnessed the imposition of research-based social policies as standard as well as the development of policy-oriented research methodologies. Legitimate social policies are, in this context, more and more dependent on the accurate use of diagnostic methods, of sophisticated program evaluation approaches, of benchmarking and so on. Inspired by this acute interest, our journal aims to host primarily articles based on policy research and methodological approaches of policy topics. Our journal is open to sociologically informed contributions from anthropologists, psychologists, statisticians, economists, historians and political scientists. General theoretical papers are also welcomed if do not deviate from the interests stated above. The editors also welcome reviews of books that are relevant to the topics covered in the journal.