Strengthening The Relationality of Heteronomous and Autonomous Legal Rules in Workers’ Decent Wage Law Policies (An Attempt to Create a Dignified Tripatrid Ecosystem)

Jurnal IUS Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.29303/ius.v11i2.1241
Any Suryani Hamzah
{"title":"Strengthening The Relationality of Heteronomous and Autonomous Legal Rules in Workers’ Decent Wage Law Policies (An Attempt to Create a Dignified Tripatrid Ecosystem)","authors":"Any Suryani Hamzah","doi":"10.29303/ius.v11i2.1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Job Creation Act (Ciptaker) protects the interests of employers (corporations) by omitting the heterogeneous Legal terms that are integrated (coherent) into the State and the workers expect to provide protection for workers in the context of determining and providing decent wages for workers. These legal circumstances demonstrate that, under the Job Creation Act, the application of autonomous legal norms predominates over the application of heteronomous legal principles. Such a situation affects the obscure presence of the State in providing decent employment for workers and upsets the tripartite ecosystem. It is employed to restore the degradation of the quality of the relationship between the two parties within the Job Creation Act. Therefore, it is necessary to make legal reconstruction efforts related to matters associated with the determination and payment of wages for workers in the Job Creation Act that emerge uncertainty and injustice for workers, to produce a formulation of a decent and fair wage legal policy to establish a relationship between the state, workers, and decent employers (Tripart ides). This research uses normative legal research methods, the type of research used in juridical normative research is descriptive. As for the approaches used in this research, there are several methods found in normative law research, among others: conceptual approaches, and philosophical approaches.
","PeriodicalId":34628,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i2.1241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Job Creation Act (Ciptaker) protects the interests of employers (corporations) by omitting the heterogeneous Legal terms that are integrated (coherent) into the State and the workers expect to provide protection for workers in the context of determining and providing decent wages for workers. These legal circumstances demonstrate that, under the Job Creation Act, the application of autonomous legal norms predominates over the application of heteronomous legal principles. Such a situation affects the obscure presence of the State in providing decent employment for workers and upsets the tripartite ecosystem. It is employed to restore the degradation of the quality of the relationship between the two parties within the Job Creation Act. Therefore, it is necessary to make legal reconstruction efforts related to matters associated with the determination and payment of wages for workers in the Job Creation Act that emerge uncertainty and injustice for workers, to produce a formulation of a decent and fair wage legal policy to establish a relationship between the state, workers, and decent employers (Tripart ides). This research uses normative legal research methods, the type of research used in juridical normative research is descriptive. As for the approaches used in this research, there are several methods found in normative law research, among others: conceptual approaches, and philosophical approaches.
强化工人体面工资法政策中他律规则与自治规则的关系(构建有尊严的三角生态系统的尝试)
《创造就业法案》(Ciptaker)通过省略与国家和工人期望在确定和提供体面工资的背景下为工人提供保护的异质法律术语来保护雇主(公司)的利益。这些法律情况表明,根据《创造就业法》,自治法律规范的适用高于他律法原则的适用。这种情况影响到国家在为工人提供体面就业方面的模糊存在,并扰乱了三方生态系统。它被用来恢复《创造就业法案》中两党关系质量的退化。因此,有必要对《就业创造法》中与工人工资的确定和支付有关的事项进行法律重建,这些事项对工人产生了不确定性和不公正,以制定体面和公平的工资法律政策,以建立国家、工人和体面雇主之间的关系(Tripart ides)。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,法律规范性研究采用描述性研究类型。至于本研究中使用的方法,规范性法研究中有几种方法,其中包括概念方法和哲学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信