Normative and legal regulation of the scope of collective agreements and contracts

I.V. Tupikov
{"title":"Normative and legal regulation of the scope of collective agreements and contracts","authors":"I.V. Tupikov","doi":"10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the development of legislation in the field of collective agreement regulation, focuses on the problems of reforming the current legislation that regulates the conclusion of collective agreements and agreements, and draws relevant conclusions. It is noted that the collective agreement regulation, which provides for the direct participation of the subjects of labor relations in establishing working conditions through the conclusion of social partnership acts, is gaining special relevance today. And that is why it is urgent to reform the current legislation in the field of concluding collective agreements, since this agreement is an important component of the legal technique of creation in the legal science of Ukraine. It was concluded that despite the significant number of normative legal acts, there remains a sufficient number of undefined and problematic issues that serve as an obstacle to the establishment of effective collective and contractual labor regulation. One of these problems was the uncertainty of the legal content of the concepts of “collective contract” and “collective agreement” in the current labor legislation of Ukraine, although this issue has been repeatedly covered in scientific literature. And if the current Code of Labor Laws of Ukraine contains a chapter dedicated to the collective agreement, then there are no regulations regarding collective agreements at all, which is one of the significant shortcomings. It was established that with the adoption of the new version of the Law “On Collective Agreements and Contracts” dated February 23, 2023, such categories were defined as “branch agreement of limited effect”; “collective agreement (general, sectoral (inter-sectoral), limited sectoral, territorial, territorial in a separate industry)”; “collective agreement” “employee”; “employer”, and a number of issues regarding which there were legislative gaps were settled at the legislative level. The activation of collective bargaining in the conditions of martial law is noted, which is an indispensable tool for regulating social and labor relations, which provides an opportunity to mitigate negative social consequences for employees. Because since the full-scale invasion of Russia into Ukraine, devastating blows have also been inflicted on the development of the existing system of collective and contractual work.","PeriodicalId":474211,"journal":{"name":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analìtično-porìvnâlʹne pravoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the development of legislation in the field of collective agreement regulation, focuses on the problems of reforming the current legislation that regulates the conclusion of collective agreements and agreements, and draws relevant conclusions. It is noted that the collective agreement regulation, which provides for the direct participation of the subjects of labor relations in establishing working conditions through the conclusion of social partnership acts, is gaining special relevance today. And that is why it is urgent to reform the current legislation in the field of concluding collective agreements, since this agreement is an important component of the legal technique of creation in the legal science of Ukraine. It was concluded that despite the significant number of normative legal acts, there remains a sufficient number of undefined and problematic issues that serve as an obstacle to the establishment of effective collective and contractual labor regulation. One of these problems was the uncertainty of the legal content of the concepts of “collective contract” and “collective agreement” in the current labor legislation of Ukraine, although this issue has been repeatedly covered in scientific literature. And if the current Code of Labor Laws of Ukraine contains a chapter dedicated to the collective agreement, then there are no regulations regarding collective agreements at all, which is one of the significant shortcomings. It was established that with the adoption of the new version of the Law “On Collective Agreements and Contracts” dated February 23, 2023, such categories were defined as “branch agreement of limited effect”; “collective agreement (general, sectoral (inter-sectoral), limited sectoral, territorial, territorial in a separate industry)”; “collective agreement” “employee”; “employer”, and a number of issues regarding which there were legislative gaps were settled at the legislative level. The activation of collective bargaining in the conditions of martial law is noted, which is an indispensable tool for regulating social and labor relations, which provides an opportunity to mitigate negative social consequences for employees. Because since the full-scale invasion of Russia into Ukraine, devastating blows have also been inflicted on the development of the existing system of collective and contractual work.
规范和法律规定集体协议和合同的范围
文章分析了集体协议订立领域立法的发展,重点探讨了改革现行集体协议订立立法中存在的问题,并得出了相关结论。委员会注意到,集体协议条例规定劳动关系主体通过缔结社会伙伴关系法直接参与建立工作条件,这一条例今天具有特别的意义。这就是为什么迫切需要改革缔结集体协议领域的现行立法,因为这一协议是乌克兰法律科学中创造法律技术的一个重要组成部分。会议的结论是,尽管有大量的规范性法律行为,但仍有足够数量的不明确和有问题的问题妨碍建立有效的集体和合同劳动条例。其中一个问题是乌克兰现行劳工立法中“集体合同”和“集体协议”概念的法律内容不确定,尽管这一问题已在科学文献中多次提及。如果乌克兰现行的《劳动法》有一章专门讨论集体协议,那么就根本没有关于集体协议的规定,这是它的一个重大缺陷。经确定,随着2023年2月23日新版《集体协议和合同法》的通过,这些类别被定义为“有限效力的分支协议”;“集体协议(一般、部门(部门间)、有限部门、地区、单独行业的地区)”;“集体协议”“员工”;“雇主”和一些存在立法空白的问题在立法一级得到解决。委员会注意到在戒严法条件下集体谈判的激活,这是调节社会和劳动关系的不可或缺的工具,它为减轻对雇员的消极社会后果提供了机会。因为自从俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰以来,现有的集体和合同工作制度的发展也受到了毁灭性的打击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信