Yu. M M. Baranova, Karaulova, N. Kupina, O. L. Mykhaleva, A. Chudinov, O. I. Sheihal
{"title":"LEXICAL AND SYNTACTIC PECULIARITIES OF UKRAINIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE","authors":"Yu. M M. Baranova, Karaulova, N. Kupina, O. L. Mykhaleva, A. Chudinov, O. I. Sheihal","doi":"10.30525/978-9934-588-37-2/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Political communication has become a popular subject of scientific interest today. The problematics of political linguistics in Ukrainian science is quite large-scale and covers both general theoretical issues and the study of particular aspects of political communication. The foundations of political discourse theory were laid in the 1950s of the XX century by representatives of Cambridge and Oxford schools of philosophy who analysed the linguistic context of the public thought. The theoretical bases for the development of this problematics are laid in the works of T.A. van Dijk 1 , R. Bart 2 . Political discourse came in the view of linguists in the 70ʼs of the XX century. The series of scientific reserches has emerged; there the features of political communication were discussed. in details or briefly. that discusses. Subsequently, a new branch of linguistics – political linguistics – began to develop. The proponents of this trend studied specific units within political texts (works of: A. M. Baranova, Yu. M. Karaulova 3 , N. Kupina 4 , O. L. Mykhaleva 5 , A. P. Chudinov 6 , O. I. Sheihal 7 and others). The monographs of L. P. Nahorna 8 , N. Kondratenko 9 has appeared in the national linguistics.","PeriodicalId":272800,"journal":{"name":"MODERN RESEARCHES IN PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN RESEARCHES IN PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-588-37-2/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Political communication has become a popular subject of scientific interest today. The problematics of political linguistics in Ukrainian science is quite large-scale and covers both general theoretical issues and the study of particular aspects of political communication. The foundations of political discourse theory were laid in the 1950s of the XX century by representatives of Cambridge and Oxford schools of philosophy who analysed the linguistic context of the public thought. The theoretical bases for the development of this problematics are laid in the works of T.A. van Dijk 1 , R. Bart 2 . Political discourse came in the view of linguists in the 70ʼs of the XX century. The series of scientific reserches has emerged; there the features of political communication were discussed. in details or briefly. that discusses. Subsequently, a new branch of linguistics – political linguistics – began to develop. The proponents of this trend studied specific units within political texts (works of: A. M. Baranova, Yu. M. Karaulova 3 , N. Kupina 4 , O. L. Mykhaleva 5 , A. P. Chudinov 6 , O. I. Sheihal 7 and others). The monographs of L. P. Nahorna 8 , N. Kondratenko 9 has appeared in the national linguistics.
政治传播已成为当今科学研究的热门课题。乌克兰科学中的政治语言学问题是相当大的,涵盖了一般的理论问题和政治传播的特定方面的研究。20世纪50年代,剑桥和牛津哲学学派的代表人物对公共思想的语言语境进行了分析,奠定了政治话语理论的基础。这一问题发展的理论基础是在T.A. van Dijk 1、R. Bart 2的著作中奠定的。20世纪70年代,语言学家开始关注政治话语。这一系列的科学研究已经出现;讨论了政治传播的特点。详细地或简要地讨论了。随后,一个新的语言学分支——政治语言学开始发展。这一趋势的支持者研究了政治文本中的特定单位(A. M. Baranova, Yu。M. Karaulova 3, N. Kupina 4, O. L. Mykhaleva 5, A. P. Chudinov 6, O. I. Sheihal 7等)。Nahorna 8、Kondratenko 9的专著已在民族语言学中出现。