Comparison between Bayesian Method and LSE in Estimating MTBF of NC Machine Tools

Ying-nan Kan, Xiaocui Zhu, Lihui Wang, Binbin Xu, Zhaojun Yang, Hong-zhou Li
{"title":"Comparison between Bayesian Method and LSE in Estimating MTBF of NC Machine Tools","authors":"Ying-nan Kan, Xiaocui Zhu, Lihui Wang, Binbin Xu, Zhaojun Yang, Hong-zhou Li","doi":"10.1109/CSMA.2015.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aiming at the large bias of LSE (Least Squares Estimation) in estimating MTBF (mean time between failures) under a small sample of data, a Bayesian MTBF estimating method is proposed for NC (numerical control) machine tools. To solve difficulty in directly presenting the prior distributions of Weibull parameters, an expert-judgment method which incorporates prior information is developed to indirectly obtain Weibull parameters' prior distributions. Aiming at the problem that analytic solutions to Weibull parameters' posterior distributions and estimators are impossible to obtain, a Metropolis algorithm is developed. The iteration procedure of the algorithm is presented, the posterior distribution of each parameter is simulated, and the parameter estimators and MTBF are obtained. Given the actual MTBF as standard value, the proposed method and LSE are applied to the same real case respectively. The results indicate that when sample size n≤10, relative errors of the proposed method lie between 4.43% and 7.19%, which are smaller than those of LSE. The proposed Bayesian MTBF estimating method is better than LSE and suitable for NC machine tools under small samples.","PeriodicalId":205396,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Computer Science and Mechanical Automation (CSMA)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Computer Science and Mechanical Automation (CSMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMA.2015.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aiming at the large bias of LSE (Least Squares Estimation) in estimating MTBF (mean time between failures) under a small sample of data, a Bayesian MTBF estimating method is proposed for NC (numerical control) machine tools. To solve difficulty in directly presenting the prior distributions of Weibull parameters, an expert-judgment method which incorporates prior information is developed to indirectly obtain Weibull parameters' prior distributions. Aiming at the problem that analytic solutions to Weibull parameters' posterior distributions and estimators are impossible to obtain, a Metropolis algorithm is developed. The iteration procedure of the algorithm is presented, the posterior distribution of each parameter is simulated, and the parameter estimators and MTBF are obtained. Given the actual MTBF as standard value, the proposed method and LSE are applied to the same real case respectively. The results indicate that when sample size n≤10, relative errors of the proposed method lie between 4.43% and 7.19%, which are smaller than those of LSE. The proposed Bayesian MTBF estimating method is better than LSE and suitable for NC machine tools under small samples.
贝叶斯方法与LSE方法在数控机床MTBF估计中的比较
针对LSE(最小二乘估计)在小样本数据下估计MTBF(平均无故障时间)时存在较大偏差的问题,提出了一种用于数控机床的贝叶斯MTBF估计方法。为解决直接表示威布尔参数先验分布的困难,提出了一种结合先验信息的专家判断方法,间接获得威布尔参数的先验分布。针对威布尔参数后验分布和估计量无法得到解析解的问题,提出了Metropolis算法。给出了算法的迭代过程,模拟了各参数的后验分布,得到了参数估计量和MTBF。以实际MTBF为标准值,将该方法和LSE分别应用于同一实际情况。结果表明,当样本量n≤10时,该方法的相对误差在4.43% ~ 7.19%之间,小于LSE方法的相对误差。所提出的贝叶斯MTBF估计方法优于LSE估计方法,适用于小样本条件下的数控机床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信