New Homes, New Challenges: The Experience of Resettled Maasai Pastoralists of RAPland Village, Olkaria Kenya

Abraham Biar Gai, Raphael Wahome, R. Bett
{"title":"New Homes, New Challenges: The Experience of Resettled Maasai Pastoralists of RAPland Village, Olkaria Kenya","authors":"Abraham Biar Gai, Raphael Wahome, R. Bett","doi":"10.36344/ccijavs.2023.v05i02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grand development projects sometimes result in the forced relocation of people. The relocation is usually stressful in terms of marginalization and social disarticulation, and more so for pastoral communities. The RAPland village at Olkaria, Kenya, was created to accommodate 155 households that were displaced by the development of a geothermal electricity generation plant. The study aimed to explain how relocation constrained resources for extensive pastoralism and how pastoralists cope through adaptation of old pastoralists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions and the creation of new strategies for resilient livelihoods using the case of the RAPland Community. Household surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observation were used to gather required information. It documented information on land, pasture, and water availability and access. It also assessed livestock production challenges before and after the resettlement and adopted coping strategies. Statistical package for social scientists (version 21) software was used in analysing the data after the screening and cleaning were done using Microsoft Excel (2019). There was a general perception that pastures and water availability were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the relocation. Besides, herders and their herds travelled longer distances, from a mean of 3.2 ±0.29 to 8.1 ±0.41 kilometres to access pastures. Before the relocation, the highest-ranking constraints were drought, livestock diseases, pasture inadequacy, and wildlife predation. After the relocation, access to water, poor pastures, grazing terrain (gulleys), wildlife predation, drought, and livestock diseases became the significant constraints affecting livestock productivity. In conclusion, the reduction in pastures and water access affected livestock productivity in spite of attempts at coping with encountered livestock challenges, the community's dependence on pastoral livestock is threatened, thus, their food and","PeriodicalId":419148,"journal":{"name":"Cross Current International Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Current International Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36344/ccijavs.2023.v05i02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grand development projects sometimes result in the forced relocation of people. The relocation is usually stressful in terms of marginalization and social disarticulation, and more so for pastoral communities. The RAPland village at Olkaria, Kenya, was created to accommodate 155 households that were displaced by the development of a geothermal electricity generation plant. The study aimed to explain how relocation constrained resources for extensive pastoralism and how pastoralists cope through adaptation of old pastoralists' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions and the creation of new strategies for resilient livelihoods using the case of the RAPland Community. Household surveys, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and field observation were used to gather required information. It documented information on land, pasture, and water availability and access. It also assessed livestock production challenges before and after the resettlement and adopted coping strategies. Statistical package for social scientists (version 21) software was used in analysing the data after the screening and cleaning were done using Microsoft Excel (2019). There was a general perception that pastures and water availability were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the relocation. Besides, herders and their herds travelled longer distances, from a mean of 3.2 ±0.29 to 8.1 ±0.41 kilometres to access pastures. Before the relocation, the highest-ranking constraints were drought, livestock diseases, pasture inadequacy, and wildlife predation. After the relocation, access to water, poor pastures, grazing terrain (gulleys), wildlife predation, drought, and livestock diseases became the significant constraints affecting livestock productivity. In conclusion, the reduction in pastures and water access affected livestock productivity in spite of attempts at coping with encountered livestock challenges, the community's dependence on pastoral livestock is threatened, thus, their food and
新家园,新挑战:肯尼亚奥卡利亚拉普兰村重新安置的马赛牧民的经历
大型开发项目有时会导致人们被迫搬迁。在边缘化和社会脱节方面,重新安置通常是有压力的,对牧区来说更是如此。肯尼亚奥尔卡里亚的拉普兰村是为了容纳155户因开发地热发电厂而流离失所的家庭而建立的。该研究旨在以拉普兰社区为例,解释搬迁如何限制了广泛畜牧业的资源,以及牧民如何通过适应老牧民的知识、态度和观念以及制定新的弹性生计战略来应对。采用入户调查、关键信息者访谈、焦点小组讨论和实地观察等方法收集所需信息。它记录了关于土地、牧场和水的可用性和获取的信息。它还评估了重新安置前后的畜牧生产挑战,并采取了应对策略。使用Microsoft Excel(2019)进行筛选和清理后,使用社会科学家统计软件包(版本21)软件对数据进行分析。总体上认为迁移对牧场和水分有效性有显著影响(P<0.05)。此外,牧民及其畜群前往牧场的平均路程为3.2±0.29 ~ 8.1±0.41公里。在迁移之前,排名最高的制约因素是干旱、牲畜疾病、牧场不足和野生动物捕食。搬迁后,水源、贫瘠的牧场、放牧地形(沟渠)、野生动物捕食、干旱和牲畜疾病成为影响牲畜生产力的重大制约因素。总之,牧场和水源的减少影响了畜牧业的生产力,尽管人们试图应对遇到的畜牧业挑战,但社区对畜牧业的依赖受到了威胁,因此,他们的食物和用水也受到了威胁
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信