Walking and telling the territory: reclaiming Mapuche planning through storytelling and land-based methodologies

M. Ugarte, Miguel Melin, Natalia Caniguan
{"title":"Walking and telling the territory: reclaiming Mapuche planning through storytelling and land-based methodologies","authors":"M. Ugarte, Miguel Melin, Natalia Caniguan","doi":"10.1080/23802014.2022.2117406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The spatial disciplines have slowly started to acknowledge their complicity with Indigenous dispossession in settler colonial contexts. Since early contact, instruments of land appropriation like surveying, mapping, town building, zoning, and place-naming have helped legitimise settler presence and imposed Western spatial relations over Indigenous territories. Indigenous planning – understood as planning by, for, and with Indigenous peoples grounded in their worldviews, values, and priorities – pre-dates and stands in stark contrast to dominant planning discourses. This paper offers methodological reflections on a participatory action research project that seeks to rebuild a Mapuche spatial planning knowledge base that still exists despite state-led attempts to disarticulate Mapuche socio-spatial relations. Within the logic of Indigenous resurgence, we consider the power of land-based walking and storytelling methodologies as tools to rebuild Mapuche spatial planning. By deepening embodied community knowledge of the land, renaming places, and (re)producing community-owned knowledge that refuses to be shared outwardly such methodologies not only contest the legitimacy of Western planning systems, but reassert the principles that have long guided Mapuche spatial planning and support the reconstruction of Mapuche territory. We also explore the limits of such approaches and whether they can reorient the ethics of Western planning towards Indigenous priorities.","PeriodicalId":398229,"journal":{"name":"Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2022.2117406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The spatial disciplines have slowly started to acknowledge their complicity with Indigenous dispossession in settler colonial contexts. Since early contact, instruments of land appropriation like surveying, mapping, town building, zoning, and place-naming have helped legitimise settler presence and imposed Western spatial relations over Indigenous territories. Indigenous planning – understood as planning by, for, and with Indigenous peoples grounded in their worldviews, values, and priorities – pre-dates and stands in stark contrast to dominant planning discourses. This paper offers methodological reflections on a participatory action research project that seeks to rebuild a Mapuche spatial planning knowledge base that still exists despite state-led attempts to disarticulate Mapuche socio-spatial relations. Within the logic of Indigenous resurgence, we consider the power of land-based walking and storytelling methodologies as tools to rebuild Mapuche spatial planning. By deepening embodied community knowledge of the land, renaming places, and (re)producing community-owned knowledge that refuses to be shared outwardly such methodologies not only contest the legitimacy of Western planning systems, but reassert the principles that have long guided Mapuche spatial planning and support the reconstruction of Mapuche territory. We also explore the limits of such approaches and whether they can reorient the ethics of Western planning towards Indigenous priorities.
行走和讲述领土:通过讲故事和基于土地的方法恢复马普切人的规划
空间学科已经慢慢地开始承认他们在移民殖民背景下与土著剥夺的共谋。自早期接触以来,土地征用工具,如测量、测绘、城镇建设、分区和地名,帮助定居者的存在合法化,并将西方的空间关系强加于土著领土。土著规划——被理解为基于土著人民的世界观、价值观和优先事项的规划——早于主流规划话语,并与之形成鲜明对比。本文提供了一个参与性行动研究项目的方法论反思,该项目旨在重建马普切人的空间规划知识库,尽管国家主导的试图破坏马普切人的社会空间关系,但这个知识库仍然存在。在土著复兴的逻辑中,我们将陆上行走和讲故事的方法作为重建马普切空间规划的工具。通过深化对土地的具体社区知识,重新命名地点,以及(重新)产生拒绝对外分享的社区拥有的知识,这些方法不仅挑战了西方规划系统的合法性,而且重申了长期以来指导马普切空间规划和支持马普切领土重建的原则。我们还探讨了这些方法的局限性,以及它们是否可以将西方规划的伦理重新定位于土著优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信