Evaluating the Benefits of Systematic Project Management in Large Public Sector Projects

L. Guzmán, Silke Steinbach, Philipp Diebold, Thomas Zehler, Klaus Schneider, Matthias Habbe
{"title":"Evaluating the Benefits of Systematic Project Management in Large Public Sector Projects","authors":"L. Guzmán, Silke Steinbach, Philipp Diebold, Thomas Zehler, Klaus Schneider, Matthias Habbe","doi":"10.1145/2896839.2896841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After an external audit of top-priority projects, the Federal Office for Equipment, Information Technology, and In-Support of the German Armed Forces decided to implement a new project management (PM) system. The new PM system implies major changes in the organization and management of projects and thus affects a large number of stakeholders. We designed a formative evaluation to understand the adequacy and acceptance of the new PM system and to elicit stakeholders’ feedback in order to improve the new PM system and the related transfer strategy prior to rollout. The evaluation also aims at deriving recommendations for increasing the acceptance of the PM system as well as identifying key performance indicators to allow continuous evaluation of the PM system. We chose to perform a multiple-case study in which a sample of stakeholders will try some components of the new PM system and provide feedback on their adequacy. We will also perform interviews and use observations and focus groups to systematically elicit stakeholders’ insights regarding the acceptance of the new PM system and the related transfer strategy.","PeriodicalId":386949,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Conducting Empirical Studies in Industry (CESI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2896839.2896841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

After an external audit of top-priority projects, the Federal Office for Equipment, Information Technology, and In-Support of the German Armed Forces decided to implement a new project management (PM) system. The new PM system implies major changes in the organization and management of projects and thus affects a large number of stakeholders. We designed a formative evaluation to understand the adequacy and acceptance of the new PM system and to elicit stakeholders’ feedback in order to improve the new PM system and the related transfer strategy prior to rollout. The evaluation also aims at deriving recommendations for increasing the acceptance of the PM system as well as identifying key performance indicators to allow continuous evaluation of the PM system. We chose to perform a multiple-case study in which a sample of stakeholders will try some components of the new PM system and provide feedback on their adequacy. We will also perform interviews and use observations and focus groups to systematically elicit stakeholders’ insights regarding the acceptance of the new PM system and the related transfer strategy.
评估大型公共部门项目系统项目管理的效益
在对最优先项目进行外部审计后,德国武装部队联邦装备、信息技术和支持办公室决定实施一种新的项目管理(PM)系统。新的项目管理系统意味着项目组织和管理的重大变化,因此影响了大量的涉众。我们设计了一个形成性的评估来理解新的项目管理系统的充分性和可接受性,并引出利益相关者的反馈,以便在推出之前改进新的项目管理系统和相关的转移策略。评估还旨在提出建议,以提高对项目管理系统的接受程度,并确定关键绩效指标,以便对项目管理系统进行持续评估。我们选择执行一个多案例研究,其中一个涉众样本将尝试新的项目管理系统的一些组件,并提供关于其充分性的反馈。我们还将进行访谈,并使用观察和焦点小组来系统地引出利益相关者对新项目管理系统和相关转移策略的接受情况的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信