{"title":"Exploring attitudinal development in computer-supported groups","authors":"I. Zigurs, G. DeSanctis, J. Billingsley","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.1989.49261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To explore the development of group attitudes in a group decision support system (GDSS) environment, eight groups of four and five persons each met in a computer-supported conference room over a period of two months. The groups addressed two strategic planning tasks; each group met for a total of eight 2-h sessions. Members' attitudes toward the group decision process and the quality of meeting outcomes were assessed following each meeting. Results suggest three patterns of adoption of the GDSS technology: adopters, discarders, and rejecters. The authors discuss attitudinal development in these three types of groups and the relationship between attitudes and the quality of group planning in the GDSS environment.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":384442,"journal":{"name":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1989.49261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
To explore the development of group attitudes in a group decision support system (GDSS) environment, eight groups of four and five persons each met in a computer-supported conference room over a period of two months. The groups addressed two strategic planning tasks; each group met for a total of eight 2-h sessions. Members' attitudes toward the group decision process and the quality of meeting outcomes were assessed following each meeting. Results suggest three patterns of adoption of the GDSS technology: adopters, discarders, and rejecters. The authors discuss attitudinal development in these three types of groups and the relationship between attitudes and the quality of group planning in the GDSS environment.<>