From Verification to Specification Inference

W. Chin, C. David
{"title":"From Verification to Specification Inference","authors":"W. Chin, C. David","doi":"10.1109/TASE.2012.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, the focus of specification mechanism has been on improving its ability to cover a wider range of problems more accurately, while the effectiveness of verification is left to the underlying theorem provers. Our work attempts a novel approach, where the focus is on designing good specification mechanisms to achieve better expressivity (the specification should capture more accurately and concisely the functionality of the corresponding code) and better verifiability (the verification process should succeed in more scenarios than the corresponding verification without the specification enhancements, with better or similar performance). Moreover, we are also interested in providing the necessary tools to assist the user with the important but tedious task of constructing desired specifications. Existing approaches to specification construction tend to be either fully manual or fully automatic. We propose a new framework for specification construction that can be done selectively and incrementally. This framework allows preconditions and postconditions to be selectively inferred via a set of specified variables, that included synthesis for unknown functions and relations.","PeriodicalId":417979,"journal":{"name":"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Sixth International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditionally, the focus of specification mechanism has been on improving its ability to cover a wider range of problems more accurately, while the effectiveness of verification is left to the underlying theorem provers. Our work attempts a novel approach, where the focus is on designing good specification mechanisms to achieve better expressivity (the specification should capture more accurately and concisely the functionality of the corresponding code) and better verifiability (the verification process should succeed in more scenarios than the corresponding verification without the specification enhancements, with better or similar performance). Moreover, we are also interested in providing the necessary tools to assist the user with the important but tedious task of constructing desired specifications. Existing approaches to specification construction tend to be either fully manual or fully automatic. We propose a new framework for specification construction that can be done selectively and incrementally. This framework allows preconditions and postconditions to be selectively inferred via a set of specified variables, that included synthesis for unknown functions and relations.
从验证到规范推理
传统上,规范机制的重点是提高其更准确地涵盖更广泛问题的能力,而验证的有效性则留给了底层定理证明者。我们的工作尝试了一种新的方法,其重点是设计良好的规范机制,以实现更好的表达性(规范应该更准确、更简洁地捕获相应代码的功能)和更好的可验证性(验证过程应该在更多的场景中成功,而不是在没有规范增强的情况下进行相应的验证,具有更好或类似的性能)。此外,我们也有兴趣提供必要的工具来帮助用户完成构建所需规范的重要但乏味的任务。现有的规范构建方法要么是完全手动的,要么是完全自动的。我们提出了一个新的规范构建框架,它可以选择性地、增量地完成。该框架允许通过一组指定变量选择性地推断前置条件和后置条件,其中包括未知函数和关系的综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信