Dietmar Pfahl, Huishi Yin, M. Mäntylä, Jürgen Münch
{"title":"How is exploratory testing used? A state-of-the-practice survey","authors":"Dietmar Pfahl, Huishi Yin, M. Mäntylä, Jürgen Münch","doi":"10.1145/2652524.2652531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Exploratory Testing has experienced a rise in popularity in the industry with the emergence of agile development practices, yet it remains unclear, in which domains and how it is used in practice.\n Goal: To study how software engineers understand and apply the principles of exploratory testing, as well as the specific advantages and difficulties they experience.\n Method: We conducted an online survey in the period June to August 2013 among Estonian and Finnish software developers and testers.\n Results: Our main findings are that the majority of testers, developers, and test managers using ET, (1) apply ET to usability-critical, performance-critical, security-critical and safety-critical software to a high degree; (2) use ET very flexibly in all types of test levels, activities, and phases; (3) perceive ET as an approach that supports creativity during testing and that is effective and efficient; and (4) find that ET is not easy to use and has little tool support.\n Conclusions: The high degree of application of ET in critical domains is particularly interesting and indicates a need for future research to obtain a better understanding of the effects of ET in these domains. In addition, our findings suggest that more support to ET users should be given (guidance and tools).","PeriodicalId":124452,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"28 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42
Abstract
Context: Exploratory Testing has experienced a rise in popularity in the industry with the emergence of agile development practices, yet it remains unclear, in which domains and how it is used in practice.
Goal: To study how software engineers understand and apply the principles of exploratory testing, as well as the specific advantages and difficulties they experience.
Method: We conducted an online survey in the period June to August 2013 among Estonian and Finnish software developers and testers.
Results: Our main findings are that the majority of testers, developers, and test managers using ET, (1) apply ET to usability-critical, performance-critical, security-critical and safety-critical software to a high degree; (2) use ET very flexibly in all types of test levels, activities, and phases; (3) perceive ET as an approach that supports creativity during testing and that is effective and efficient; and (4) find that ET is not easy to use and has little tool support.
Conclusions: The high degree of application of ET in critical domains is particularly interesting and indicates a need for future research to obtain a better understanding of the effects of ET in these domains. In addition, our findings suggest that more support to ET users should be given (guidance and tools).