Comparison of combined intra-articular and sub-acromial injection with intra-articular injection in adhesive capsulitis

R. Manandhar, Krishna Raj Khanal, Himal Khanal, S. Gautam
{"title":"Comparison of combined intra-articular and sub-acromial injection with intra-articular injection in adhesive capsulitis","authors":"R. Manandhar, Krishna Raj Khanal, Himal Khanal, S. Gautam","doi":"10.3126/jkmc.v10i1.38969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The pain and limitation of shoulder function can disrupt daily activities of patients for months to years. Adhesive capsulitis is considered a self-limiting disease but the duration remains uncertain. The brunt of the disease is focussed on the inflamed joint capsule. On this basis, use of corticosteroid injection is justified. However, injection method is not conclusive.\nObjectives: To compare clinical benefits of intra-articular injection alone versus combined intra-articular and subacromial injections in management of adhesive capsulitis.\nMethods: Fifty-nine patients with diagnostic criteria for adhesive capsulitis were included in the study from March 2019 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups; patients who underwent intra-articular (IA) injection alone (Group 1) and those who received both intra-articular and sub-acromial (IA+SA) injection (Group 2). The injections were landmark guided. Patients were followed up at three, six, and 12 weeks. Pain was recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) and subjective function using Constant-Murley score.\nResults: Twenty-eight patients were included in Group 1 (IA) and 31 in Group 2 (IA+SA). Thirty-six patients were female (18 each in Group 1 and Group 2) and 23 patients were male (Group 1 = 13; Group 2 = 10). In the twelfth week, VAS score was reduced in both the groups. On comparing the mean value of Constant-Murley score between the two groups there is significant difference in value recorded at the sixth and twelfth week.\nConclusion: The IA+SA injection provides significant reduction in pain and better function in the short term over the IA injection.","PeriodicalId":254049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kathmandu Medical College","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kathmandu Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v10i1.38969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pain and limitation of shoulder function can disrupt daily activities of patients for months to years. Adhesive capsulitis is considered a self-limiting disease but the duration remains uncertain. The brunt of the disease is focussed on the inflamed joint capsule. On this basis, use of corticosteroid injection is justified. However, injection method is not conclusive. Objectives: To compare clinical benefits of intra-articular injection alone versus combined intra-articular and subacromial injections in management of adhesive capsulitis. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with diagnostic criteria for adhesive capsulitis were included in the study from March 2019 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups; patients who underwent intra-articular (IA) injection alone (Group 1) and those who received both intra-articular and sub-acromial (IA+SA) injection (Group 2). The injections were landmark guided. Patients were followed up at three, six, and 12 weeks. Pain was recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) and subjective function using Constant-Murley score. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included in Group 1 (IA) and 31 in Group 2 (IA+SA). Thirty-six patients were female (18 each in Group 1 and Group 2) and 23 patients were male (Group 1 = 13; Group 2 = 10). In the twelfth week, VAS score was reduced in both the groups. On comparing the mean value of Constant-Murley score between the two groups there is significant difference in value recorded at the sixth and twelfth week. Conclusion: The IA+SA injection provides significant reduction in pain and better function in the short term over the IA injection.
关节内肩胛下联合注射与关节内注射治疗粘连性囊炎的比较
背景:肩部疼痛和功能受限可影响患者数月至数年的日常活动。粘连性囊炎被认为是一种自限性疾病,但持续时间仍不确定。这种疾病主要集中在发炎的关节囊上。在此基础上,使用皮质类固醇注射是合理的。然而,注射方法尚无定论。目的:比较单独关节内注射与关节内和肩峰下联合注射治疗粘连性囊炎的临床疗效。方法:选取2019年3月至2020年9月符合粘连性囊炎诊断标准的患者59例。患者分为两组;单独接受关节内(IA)注射的患者(1组)和同时接受关节内和肩峰下(IA+SA)注射的患者(2组)。注射具有里程碑式指导。分别在3周、6周和12周对患者进行随访。疼痛用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录,主观功能用Constant-Murley评分记录。结果:1组(IA) 28例,2组(IA+SA) 31例。其中女性36例(组1、组2各18例),男性23例(组1 = 13例;组2 = 10)。第12周,两组VAS评分均降低。比较两组患者第6周和第12周的Constant-Murley评分平均值,差异有统计学意义。结论:与IA注射相比,IA+SA注射可显著减轻疼痛,短期内功能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信