Ciało mitu. Piłsudski Brunona Schulza

Eliza Kącka
{"title":"Ciało mitu. Piłsudski Brunona Schulza","authors":"Eliza Kącka","doi":"10.26881/sf.2019.13.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper focuses above all on a variant of the legend of Józef Piłsudski presented by Bruno Schulz in his literary works. It is definitely not the best known literary incarnation of the myth of Polish First Marshall, neither is it the most quoted one, like excerpts from  General Barcz by Józef Kaden-Bandrowski or from Jan Lechoń’s book of poetry Silver and Black [Srebrne i czarne]. Still, Schulz gives us a very interesting analysis of the formation of this legend, and we can find in it Schulz’s own approach and style. His views on the formation of this legend are in fact ahistorical, free of the specific context. When he writes that “unbelievable historic maturity was incarnated in this man,” he is closer to heroic narration rather than sociological analysis. It is not a coincidence then that Schulz’s sense of historic moment is intertwined with his understanding of myth and his literary mythology. The author of The Street of Crocodiles worked on his essay “How Legends Come Into Being” [Jak powstają legendy] when he was finishing “Spring,” which brings the two texts closer and gives a historical incentive for a parallel reading of both, which is also justified by their content. Schulz puts Piłsudski in his own symbolic domain and makes him an agent/actor of his own narration. The problem of his individual importance or eminence is confronted with the views of Thomas Carlyle and Edmund Burke. The aim of the paper’s author is not just a close reading of Schulz’s text, but juxtaposing it with a few other analyses of the phenomena of birth, rise, and death of the legend. Karol Irzykowski was one of the most clear-headed analysts of those processes and that is why his views are quoted in the fragments devoted to a “socio-cultural process” which he treated not as an esoteric phenomenon but as a conscious strategy of influencing people. A short analysis of the quotation from Piłsudski about the role of legends and the oppressiveness of the legendary discourse in Polish culture is also important. Piłsudski, who understood the vampirical character of legends, became a prisoner of Schulz’s creative imagination in his essay.","PeriodicalId":113600,"journal":{"name":"Schulz/Forum","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schulz/Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sf.2019.13.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper focuses above all on a variant of the legend of Józef Piłsudski presented by Bruno Schulz in his literary works. It is definitely not the best known literary incarnation of the myth of Polish First Marshall, neither is it the most quoted one, like excerpts from  General Barcz by Józef Kaden-Bandrowski or from Jan Lechoń’s book of poetry Silver and Black [Srebrne i czarne]. Still, Schulz gives us a very interesting analysis of the formation of this legend, and we can find in it Schulz’s own approach and style. His views on the formation of this legend are in fact ahistorical, free of the specific context. When he writes that “unbelievable historic maturity was incarnated in this man,” he is closer to heroic narration rather than sociological analysis. It is not a coincidence then that Schulz’s sense of historic moment is intertwined with his understanding of myth and his literary mythology. The author of The Street of Crocodiles worked on his essay “How Legends Come Into Being” [Jak powstają legendy] when he was finishing “Spring,” which brings the two texts closer and gives a historical incentive for a parallel reading of both, which is also justified by their content. Schulz puts Piłsudski in his own symbolic domain and makes him an agent/actor of his own narration. The problem of his individual importance or eminence is confronted with the views of Thomas Carlyle and Edmund Burke. The aim of the paper’s author is not just a close reading of Schulz’s text, but juxtaposing it with a few other analyses of the phenomena of birth, rise, and death of the legend. Karol Irzykowski was one of the most clear-headed analysts of those processes and that is why his views are quoted in the fragments devoted to a “socio-cultural process” which he treated not as an esoteric phenomenon but as a conscious strategy of influencing people. A short analysis of the quotation from Piłsudski about the role of legends and the oppressiveness of the legendary discourse in Polish culture is also important. Piłsudski, who understood the vampirical character of legends, became a prisoner of Schulz’s creative imagination in his essay.
神话之躯布鲁诺-舒尔茨的皮乌苏斯基
本文首先着重于布鲁诺·舒尔茨在其文学作品中所呈现的Józef Piłsudski传说的一个变体。它绝对不是波兰第一元帅神话最著名的文学化身,也不是被引用最多的,像Józef Kaden-Bandrowski的《Barcz将军》或Jan lechoski的诗集《Silver and Black》(Srebrne i czarne)一样。尽管如此,舒尔茨还是对这个传奇的形成进行了非常有趣的分析,我们可以从中找到舒尔茨自己的方法和风格。他对这一传说形成的看法实际上是非历史的,脱离了具体的背景。当他写到“难以置信的历史成熟体现在这个人身上”时,他更接近于英雄叙事,而不是社会学分析。舒尔茨的历史时刻感与他对神话和文学神话的理解交织在一起,这并非巧合。《鳄鱼街》的作者在完成《春天》时撰写了他的论文《传奇是如何形成的》(Jak powstajolegendy),这使两个文本更加接近,并为平行阅读两者提供了历史动机,这也被它们的内容所证明。舒尔茨将Piłsudski置于自己的象征领域,使其成为自己叙事的代理人/行动者。托马斯·卡莱尔和埃德蒙·伯克的观点对他个人的重要性和卓越性提出了质疑。论文作者的目的不仅仅是仔细阅读舒尔茨的文本,而是将其与其他一些对传奇的诞生、崛起和死亡现象的分析并置。Karol Irzykowski是这些过程中头脑最清醒的分析家之一,这就是为什么他的观点被引用在致力于“社会文化过程”的片段中,他认为这不是一种深奥的现象,而是一种有意识的影响人们的策略。对Piłsudski关于传说的作用和传说话语在波兰文化中的压迫性的引语的简短分析也很重要。了解传说中吸血鬼性格的Piłsudski在舒尔茨的文章中成为了创造性想象力的俘虏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信