Triple Error: Chief Justice Steele and Default - Contractual Duties in Delaware Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships

A. Vestal, J. W. Callison
{"title":"Triple Error: Chief Justice Steele and Default - Contractual Duties in Delaware Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships","authors":"A. Vestal, J. W. Callison","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1970387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a recent law review article Delaware Chief Justice Myron Steele argues that Delaware courts should interpret Delaware’s limited liability company (“LLC”) and limited partnership (“LP”) statutes as not including any default fiduciary duties. Therefore, he argues that the only fiduciary duties in Delaware LLCs and LPs arise from the parties’ express contract. Although such thought-piece musings from most state court jurists would not be particularly significant, the fact that Chief Justice Steele writes from a significant business law state means that attention is given to what he says. We argue that Chief Justice Steele is in error in three identifiable ways, which we elaborate in the remainder of this essay.","PeriodicalId":345329,"journal":{"name":"Drake University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drake University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1970387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a recent law review article Delaware Chief Justice Myron Steele argues that Delaware courts should interpret Delaware’s limited liability company (“LLC”) and limited partnership (“LP”) statutes as not including any default fiduciary duties. Therefore, he argues that the only fiduciary duties in Delaware LLCs and LPs arise from the parties’ express contract. Although such thought-piece musings from most state court jurists would not be particularly significant, the fact that Chief Justice Steele writes from a significant business law state means that attention is given to what he says. We argue that Chief Justice Steele is in error in three identifiable ways, which we elaborate in the remainder of this essay.
三重错误:首席大法官斯蒂尔与违约——特拉华州有限责任公司和有限合伙企业的合同义务
在最近的一篇法律评论文章中,特拉华州首席大法官Myron Steele认为,特拉华州法院应该将特拉华州的有限责任公司(“LLC”)和有限合伙企业(“LP”)的法规解释为不包括任何违约信托义务。因此,他认为特拉华州有限责任公司和有限责任公司的唯一信义义务来自双方的明示合同。尽管大多数州法院法学家的这种深思熟虑不会特别重要,但首席大法官斯蒂尔来自一个重要的商业法州这一事实意味着人们会关注他所说的话。我们认为,首席大法官斯蒂尔在三个可识别的方面存在错误,我们将在本文的其余部分详细阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信