Key Problems of Policy Evaluation and Comparison of How Various Techniques of Policy Evaluation Overcome Them?

M. H. Khan
{"title":"Key Problems of Policy Evaluation and Comparison of How Various Techniques of Policy Evaluation Overcome Them?","authors":"M. H. Khan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3262878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each Public Policy is encircled with an aim to have its projected and expected outcomes turn into a reality. Public policy being an integral part of political and governance process goes through arrangement of stages. This incorporates strategy conceptualisation, plan detailing, policy execution and policy assessment and evaluation (Wholey, 1982). Out of these, policy evaluation is undoubtedly, a crucial phase of policy making process, however regularly being disregarded by planners of the policy (Nachmias D, 1979) due to various reasons pertaining to their interest. Evaluation of public policy is conveying to people who are into policy planning and execution, the accessible information about the related issues, relative viability of past procedures in the policy process, its outcomes details and about the observed adequacy of public policy (Nicholas Henry, 1999:179). Whether the policy has been fruitful or not comes out from the impact evaluation which is a highly pertinent component of the public policy process and bring in the feedback to the policy administrators to let them understand the true and honest impact as well as whether the changes are due to program intervention or other factors.","PeriodicalId":122993,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3262878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Each Public Policy is encircled with an aim to have its projected and expected outcomes turn into a reality. Public policy being an integral part of political and governance process goes through arrangement of stages. This incorporates strategy conceptualisation, plan detailing, policy execution and policy assessment and evaluation (Wholey, 1982). Out of these, policy evaluation is undoubtedly, a crucial phase of policy making process, however regularly being disregarded by planners of the policy (Nachmias D, 1979) due to various reasons pertaining to their interest. Evaluation of public policy is conveying to people who are into policy planning and execution, the accessible information about the related issues, relative viability of past procedures in the policy process, its outcomes details and about the observed adequacy of public policy (Nicholas Henry, 1999:179). Whether the policy has been fruitful or not comes out from the impact evaluation which is a highly pertinent component of the public policy process and bring in the feedback to the policy administrators to let them understand the true and honest impact as well as whether the changes are due to program intervention or other factors.
政策评估的关键问题及各种政策评估技术如何克服的比较?
每一项公共政策都围绕着一个目标,即使其预测和预期的结果变成现实。公共政策作为政治和治理过程的组成部分,经历了阶段性的安排。这包括战略概念化、计划细节化、政策执行和政策评估和评价(Wholey, 1982)。其中,政策评估无疑是政策制定过程中的一个关键阶段,然而,由于与他们的利益有关的各种原因,政策规划者经常忽视政策评估(Nachmias D, 1979)。公共政策的评估是向参与政策规划和执行的人传达有关相关问题的可获得信息,政策过程中过去程序的相对可行性,其结果细节以及观察到的公共政策的充分性(Nicholas Henry, 1999:179)。政策是否卓有成效取决于影响评估,这是公共政策过程中一个高度相关的组成部分,并向政策管理者提供反馈,让他们了解真实和诚实的影响,以及变化是由于计划干预还是其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信